Integrated Landing Flap Drive System with Redundant Motors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current landing flap drive systems for aircraft require extensive installation and structural leadthroughs due to central shaft arrangements, leading to increased complexity and cost, and lack redundancy, which can compromise system safety and reliability.

Innovation Solution

The integration of the landing flap drive system into the track of the landing flap, including a step-down gear arrangement, redundant drive motors, a brake device, and a safety load path, allows for reduced installation effort, enhanced safety, and improved operational efficiency by eliminating the need for central shafts and mechanical couplings, with electronic synchronization of motors.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a central shaft arrangement is used to transmit drive power from the fuselage to the landing flap, then the drive system can be controlled centrally, but the installation complexity increases significantly due to required structural leadthroughs, deflection gear arrangements, and universal joints

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecentralized controlVSAvoidinstallation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the drive system into modular units, with each landing flap equipped with its own integrated drive system including motor, gear arrangement, and actuator. This segmentation eliminates the need for complex central shaft arrangements and universal joints, as each module operates independently while maintaining centralized control through electronic coordination.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical central shaft transmission system with electronically controlled independent drive units. Instead of mechanical power transmission through shafts and universal joints, the system uses electrical motors and electronic control signals, substituting mechanical complexity with electrical simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Power

If a central drive arrangement with shafts and universal joints is implemented, then power transmission to distributed drive stations is achieved, but production expenditure and installation cost increase considerably

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepower transmissionVSAvoidproduction cost
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The drive system is segmented into independent modular units, with each landing flap having its own complete drive system. This eliminates the need for expensive central shaft arrangements and reduces installation complexity, thereby lowering production and installation costs while maintaining full power transmission capability to each flap.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive mechanical power transmission components (shafts, universal joints, deflection gears) with electronically controlled electric motors. This substitution dramatically reduces production expenditure and installation cost while achieving the same power transmission function through electrical means.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Device complexity

If a single drive motor is used for each landing flap, then the system is simple, but system safety and reliability are compromised due to lack of redundancy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem simplicityVSAvoidsystem safety
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements redundant drive motors in each landing flap drive system as a preventive safety measure. This beforehand cushioning ensures that if one motor fails, the second motor can take over, preventing complete system failure and maintaining reliability without significantly increasing operational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the system configuration from a single motor to a dual motor arrangement, altering the redundancy parameter. This parameter change enhances system safety and reliability by providing backup capability, while the modular design keeps the added complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Adaptability or versatility

If drive components are installed separately during final assembly, then flexibility is maintained, but installation effort and time are significantly increased

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveassembly flexibilityVSAvoidinstallation efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges multiple drive components (motor, gear arrangement, actuator, brake device) into a single integrated drive system unit that is pre-assembled as one complete module. This merging maintains assembly flexibility for different aircraft configurations while dramatically improving installation efficiency, as the entire drive system can be installed in one operation rather than assembling multiple separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary assembly of the complete drive system within the track structure before final installation on the aircraft. This preliminary action allows for factory pre-assembly and testing of the integrated drive system, reducing on-site installation effort and time while maintaining the ability to adapt to different aircraft configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly simplifies the installation process, reduces production costs, enhances system safety through redundancy, and optimizes operational performance by integrating all drive components into the track, eliminating the need for structural leadthroughs and deflection gears, while ensuring structural integrity and efficient motor synchronization.

Implementation Method 1

a step-down gear arrangement to reduce the operational speed of the landing flap

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGear reduction: Gear

Implementation Method 2

the brake device may be used in a supportive manner in that it absorbs, or compensates for, a compressive force that acts on the landing flap

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectFriction: Friction

Data Source

PatentUS8157208B2Landing flap drive system
Publication Date: 2012.04.17 AIRBUS OPERATIONS GMBH
  • US8157208B2 patent drawing
  • US8157208B2 patent drawing
  • US8157208B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A landing flap drive system, in one example, includes a first drive motor for operating a landing flap. In this arrangement, the landing flap drive system is integrated in a track of the landing flap such that final assembly and integration of the system are facilitated to a significant extent.