Aircraft Landing Gear Uplock Testing via Primary System Mediation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for testing alternate landing gear systems in aircraft are inefficient and may not promptly detect faults, requiring ground-based maintenance and potentially subjecting the gear to high loads and fatigue when extending under gravity.

Innovation Solution

The method involves the primary landing gear system holding the landing gear in place while the alternate system tests and moves the uplock from a locked to an unlocked configuration, allowing for faster identification of failures and reducing maintenance needs, and enabling testing without additional hardware, potentially during flight.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the alternate landing gear system is tested by releasing the uplock and extending the gear under gravity, then the functionality of the alternate system can be confirmed, but high loads and fatigue are imposed on the landing gear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefunctionality confirmation of alternate systemVSAvoidlanding gear loads and fatigue
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStrength

Solution Approach 1:

The primary landing gear system acts as an intermediary to hold the landing gear in place during alternate system testing. Instead of allowing direct gravity-driven extension, the primary system's actuator controls the uplock movement, mediating the test process to prevent excessive loads while still enabling functionality verification of the alternate system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If ground-based maintenance testing is performed on the alternate landing gear system, then faults can be detected, but turn-around time and maintenance complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefault detection capabilityVSAvoidturn-around time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The alternate landing gear system performs self-testing during normal flight operations without requiring external ground-based maintenance intervention. The system uses its own alternate actuator to move the uplock and verify functionality, enabling autonomous fault detection that eliminates dedicated maintenance testing time and reduces turn-around time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If the uplock is moved during alternate system testing without holding the landing gear, then the test procedure is simpler, but the landing gear may drop under gravity causing high loads

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetest procedure simplicityVSAvoidgravity load on landing gear
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSForce

Solution Approach 1:

The primary landing gear system serves as a controlling intermediary during the test procedure. Its actuator manages the uplock movement in a controlled manner, preventing uncontrolled gravity-driven drops while maintaining procedural simplicity. This mediation ensures both safety and ease of operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Strength

If the primary landing gear system holds the landing gear in place during alternate system testing, then gravity-induced loads are reduced, but the primary system must remain operational during testing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanding gear load reductionVSAvoidprimary system operational requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The landing gear system is segmented into functionally independent primary and alternate systems. The primary system handles normal operations and can independently hold the gear in place, while the alternate system handles backup operations. This segmentation allows the primary system to serve as a stable platform for testing the alternate system without compromising overall system reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach simplifies maintenance, reduces turn-around times, and extends the life of the landing gear by minimizing loads and fatigue, while ensuring the alternate system's functionality is confirmed without the need for ground-based checks.

Implementation Method 1

the primary landing gear system holding the landing gear in place such that dropping of the landing gear under gravity is prevented

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGravity: Gravitation

Implementation Method 2

the or each uplock is moved from a first configuration to a second configuration by the alternate landing gear system

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMechanical force: Mechanical Force

Data Source

PatentEP4389599A1Landing gear systems and methods of testing
Publication Date: 2024.06.26 AIRBUS OPERATIONS LTD
  • EP4389599A1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP4389599A1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP4389599A1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

A method of extending a landing gear (201) of an aircraft (10) is disclosed. The aircraft (10) comprises an uplock (61) arranged to retain the landing gear (201) in a retracted position, a primary landing gear system (220) configured to retract and extend the landing gear (201), and an alternate landing gear system (230), independent from the primary landing gear system (220). The method comprises the primary landing gear system (220) holding the landing gear (201) in place while the uplock (61) is moved from a first configuration to a second configuration by the alternate landing gear system (230).