Client-Side Landing Page Variant Generation for Conversion Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Advertisers face low conversion rates due to poorly designed landing pages that do not align with user expectations, requiring a method to efficiently test and optimize landing page designs without requiring statistical expertise.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for creating instrumented landing pages with alternative versions of sections, allowing for client-side dynamic selection and display of variants, along with remote storage and management of these versions, enabling A/B testing and automatic optimization based on conversion rates.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional A/B testing methods are used to compare landing page variants, then conversion rate optimization is achieved, but statistical expertise and complexity are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion rateVSAvoidstatistical expertise requirement
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system automatically performs statistical analysis and identifies winning variants without requiring manual statistical expertise. The landing page optimizer autonomously compares conversion rates, determines statistical significance, and selects optimal variants based on predefined criteria, enabling non-statistical experts to conduct rigorous A/B testing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The landing page optimizer acts as an intermediary between the advertiser and the statistical analysis process. It provides user-friendly interfaces for defining experiments, automatically handles complex statistical computations, and presents actionable results, eliminating the need for advertisers to directly engage with statistical methodologies.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Reliability

If multiple landing page variants are tested simultaneously, then optimization effectiveness improves, but experiment management complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoptimization effectivenessVSAvoidexperiment management
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the landing page into distinct modifiable sections (headlines, images, calls to action) that can be independently varied. This allows systematic combination of elements to create multiple variants while maintaining organized management through structured experiment configurations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The platform dynamically generates and manages multiple experiment variants based on real-time conversion data. It automatically adjusts traffic allocation, identifies winning combinations, and updates test configurations without manual intervention, simplifying management of complex multi-variant experiments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If client-side scripting is used to dynamically select landing page variants, then testing flexibility improves, but browser compatibility requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetesting flexibilityVSAvoidbrowser compatibility constraints
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system changes the parameter of script execution timing and provides fallback mechanisms. It attempts client-side execution for flexibility but degrades to server-side rendering or static content delivery if client-side scripting is unavailable, maintaining functionality across different browser environments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS7739594B2Encoding and displaying default landing page content
Publication Date: 2010.06.15 GOOGLE LLC
  • US7739594B2 patent drawing
  • US7739594B2 patent drawing
  • US7739594B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods, systems, and apparatus, including computer program products for defining landing pages to test different landing page designs. A combination is determined of one alternative version for each of one or more sections in an instrumented landing page. In a client, a landing page variant is generated. Each section of the landing page variant is the corresponding alternative version of the section defined by the combination. The landing page variant is generated in the client by determining for each section whether to display an additional version of the section in lieu of the original version of the section. If it is so determined, the additional version of the section is retrieved and inserted into a new location of the landing page variant, and at least one tag is inserted to cause the original version of the section to be disregarded.