Aircraft Landing Zone Imaging for 3D Obstacle Evaluation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional methods for landing zone evaluation fail to effectively detect and avoid obstacles in real-time, posing risks to aircraft safety and passenger safety.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that utilize imaging sensors and navigation data to capture and process images of a landing zone, generating a point cloud, filtering outliers, and localizing the data into world coordinates to create a surface model, enabling navigation instructions to avoid obstacles.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If conventional methods are used for landing zone evaluation, then the system is simple, but obstacle detection precision and safety are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle detection precisionVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The landing zone evaluation system segments the detection process into multiple independent modules: image capture module, point cloud generation module, obstacle detection module, and safety evaluation module. Each module performs a specific function, allowing the system to achieve high detection precision through specialized processing while managing complexity through modular architecture.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from conventional two-dimensional image analysis to three-dimensional point cloud processing. By capturing depth information and converting images into 3D spatial representations, the system achieves superior obstacle detection precision and can identify objects that would be invisible or ambiguous in 2D images alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If real-time obstacle detection is implemented, then aircraft safety is improved, but processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaircraft safetyVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary processing by generating point clouds from captured images in real-time as the aircraft approaches the landing zone. This preliminary 3D reconstruction enables subsequent obstacle detection to be performed rapidly on already-processed spatial data, reducing the time required for final safety evaluation while maintaining high reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces conventional mechanical or manual landing zone assessment methods with automated optical sensing and computational processing. Imaging sensors and point cloud algorithms automatically detect obstacles and evaluate safety, eliminating the need for time-consuming manual inspection while providing continuous real-time monitoring for enhanced aircraft safety.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Measurement precision

If detailed point cloud processing is performed, then obstacle localization accuracy is improved, but computational complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle localization accuracyVSAvoiddata processing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system extracts only the essential features from the complete point cloud data for obstacle localization. Instead of processing every single point in the detailed point cloud, the algorithm identifies and extracts key characteristic points that define obstacle positions, shapes, and critical dimensions. This extraction approach maintains high localization accuracy while significantly reducing computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different processing quality levels to different regions of the landing zone based on their importance. Areas closer to the aircraft trajectory or containing potential obstacles receive higher processing detail and more rigorous analysis, while distant or clear areas use simplified processing. This local quality adjustment optimizes the balance between localization accuracy and computational complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentEP3985645B1Landing zone evaluation
Publication Date: 2025.12.10 AURORA FLIGHT SCIENCES CORP
  • EP3985645B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP3985645B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP3985645B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Disclosed herein is a system that comprises one or more imaging sensors coupled to an aircraft and one or more navigation sensors coupled to the aircraft proximate to the one or more imaging sensors. The system further comprises an imaging module configured to capture images of a landing zone for the aircraft while the aircraft is in flight. The system additionally comprises a location determining module configured to associate a corresponding one of a plurality of location data with each one of the captured images. The plurality of location data is determined using one or more navigation sensors coupled to the aircraft. The system also comprises an object-identifying module configured to identify and locate one or more objects within the landing zone, relative to the aircraft, using the captured images and the location data associated with the captured images.