Autonomous Vehicle Lane Adjustment Around Slow Lead Agents

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in navigating around slow lead agents on highways, as existing strategies either increase the risk of rear-end collisions or cause travel delays, especially for large vehicles like trucks with limited maneuverability.

Innovation Solution

Implementing a lane adjustment technique that uses sensor data to detect slow lead agents and dynamically determine whether to perform a lane change, based on speed thresholds and environmental conditions, through a state machine that penalizes slow lane segments to avoid delays and collisions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the autonomous vehicle maintains a safe distance behind the slow lead agent, then collision risk is reduced, but travel time increases and delivery schedules are delayed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision avoidanceVSAvoidtravel time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system dynamically adjusts the vehicle's lane selection and speed based on real-time conditions. When a slow lead agent is detected, the vehicle evaluates whether to change lanes to overtake or maintain current lane, adjusting its behavior dynamically rather than following a static rule set. This allows the vehicle to minimize travel time while maintaining safety by only overtaking when conditions permit.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the speed and position of the lead agent, as well as the vehicle's own speed, to determine whether the lead agent is moving too slowly. This feedback loop enables the autonomous vehicle to make informed decisions about lane changes and overtaking maneuvers, balancing safety requirements with delivery schedule constraints.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the autonomous vehicle increases speed to maintain schedule, then productivity improves, but the risk of rear-end collision increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedelivery schedule adherenceVSAvoidcollision risk
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The vehicle dynamically adjusts its speed based on the relative speed between itself and the lead agent. When the lead agent is detected to be moving below a threshold speed, the autonomous vehicle can accelerate to overtake in adjacent lanes. The system continuously monitors conditions and adjusts speed dynamically, allowing the vehicle to maintain productivity while managing collision risk through real-time decision-making.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of resolving the speed conflict in the same lane by maintaining distance, the system transitions to another dimension by changing lanes. When a slow lead agent is detected, the autonomous vehicle evaluates adjacent lanes for available space and executes lane changes to overtake, effectively resolving the speed mismatch by moving to a different spatial dimension rather than compromising safety in the current lane.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Loss of time

If the autonomous vehicle performs lane change maneuvers to overtake slow agents, then travel time is reduced, but vehicle complexity and maneuverability constraints are challenged

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetravel timeVSAvoidmaneuverability requirements
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary checks before executing lane change maneuvers. It evaluates adjacent lanes for available space, checks for oncoming traffic, and assesses whether the lead agent is truly moving too slowly before initiating an overtake. This preliminary action reduces the need for complex last-minute maneuvers and simplifies the overall control system by following a structured decision-making process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies different control strategies to different spatial locations. In the current lane, the vehicle maintains a safe following distance. In adjacent lanes, the vehicle evaluates conditions for potential overtaking. This local quality approach allows the vehicle to handle maneuverability constraints by applying appropriate actions to appropriate spatial zones, simplifying the control logic for each specific location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS12162492B2Lane adjustment techniques for slow lead agents
Publication Date: 2024.12.10 WAYMO LLC
  • US12162492B2 patent drawing
  • US12162492B2 patent drawing
  • US12162492B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Example embodiments relate to lane adjustment techniques for slow lead agents. A vehicle computing system may use sensor data depicting the surrounding environment to detect when another vehicle is traveling in front of the vehicle at a speed that is less than a threshold minimum speed. If the other vehicle fails to increase speed above the minimum speed, the computing system may determine whether to change lanes to avoid the other vehicle based on speed data for other lanes. In some implementations, the computing system assigns penalties to lane segments surrounding the vehicle based on speed data for the different lane segments. For instance, the path finding system for the vehicle can use penalties and speed data to determine efficient routes that safely circumvent slow agents.