Lane-Change Collision Detection Across Non-Adjacent Lanes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional collision avoidance systems for vehicles are ineffective in monitoring and providing feedback for potential collisions with vehicles not in adjacent lanes, leading to increased collision risks on multi-lane roads.

Innovation Solution

A computer-implemented method that receives sensor data from various sources, generates lane change data values for vehicles relative to a lane position, determines collision risk values, and generates output signals to notify drivers of potential collisions, including those in non-adjacent lanes by analyzing head positions, eye gaze directions, and other contextual information.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional collision avoidance systems only monitor adjacent lanes, then the system complexity remains low, but the collision detection coverage is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision detection coverageVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the monitoring task by dividing the road into multiple lane zones (adjacent lanes and near lanes) and assigns different monitoring strategies to each zone. Sensors selectively monitor adjacent lanes with high frequency while monitoring near lanes with lower frequency, allowing comprehensive coverage without uniformly high system complexity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies partial monitoring action to near lanes rather than full monitoring. By detecting vehicles in near lanes only when they attempt lane changes or when proximity thresholds are met, the system achieves adequate detection coverage without the complexity of continuous full-spectrum monitoring of all lanes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

2Reliability

If the system monitors only adjacent lanes, then the processing speed remains high, but the area covered for collision detection is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision risk detection accuracyVSAvoidmonitoring area
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extends monitoring from the traditional two-dimensional adjacent lane space to include the third dimension of near lanes. By incorporating vehicles from multiple lane positions into the collision risk assessment, the system achieves three-dimensional spatial awareness without proportionally increasing processing burden

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If sensor data from multiple lanes is analyzed, then the collision notification accuracy improves, but the data processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecollision risk assessment accuracyVSAvoiddata processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary filtering of sensor data by pre-identifying vehicles in near lanes that pose potential collision risks based on their position and movement patterns. This preliminary action allows the main collision assessment algorithm to focus only on relevant vehicles, maintaining high accuracy while reducing overall processing time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11912267B2Collision avoidance system for vehicle interactions
Publication Date: 2024.02.27 HARMAN INT IND INC
  • US11912267B2 patent drawing
  • US11912267B2 patent drawing
  • US11912267B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Embodiments of the present disclosure set forth a computer-implemented method comprising receiving, from at least one sensor, sensor data associated with an environment, generating, based on the sensor data, a set of lane change data values associated with positions of at least two vehicles relative to a first lane position in the environment, determining, based on the set of lane change data values, a collision risk value associated with the at least two vehicles attempting to occupy the first lane position, and generating, based on the collision risk value, an output signal to a first vehicle included in the at least two vehicles.