Lane Change Recommendation via Speed Comparison

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional driving assistance technologies require drivers to determine the appropriate traffic lane for lane changes, which is insufficient as they only consider the state of their own lane and adjacent lane, lacking comprehensive analysis.

Innovation Solution

A driving assistance apparatus that determines the recommended travel lane by comparing the preset vehicle speed with the travel states of preceding and adjacent vehicles, allowing the system to autonomously decide lane changes based on relative speeds and available lane conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the driver determines the traffic lane manually, then the driver has full control over lane selection, but the determination process becomes complex and time-consuming for the driver

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveEase of lane selectionVSAvoidComplexity of lane determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system enables automatic lane determination by having the determination unit autonomously select the recommended lane based on vehicle states and traffic conditions, eliminating the need for manual driver intervention in lane selection decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The determination unit acts as an intermediary between the complex traffic environment and the driver, processing multiple vehicle state parameters and traffic conditions to provide a simplified lane recommendation that the driver can easily accept or reject

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Measurement precision

If the system only considers own lane and adjacent lane states, then the system simplicity is maintained, but the lane determination accuracy is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAccuracy of lane determinationVSAvoidComplexity of traffic state analysis
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the traffic environment into distinct analysis units (own vehicle state, preceding vehicle state, adjacent vehicle state, lane state) that are processed separately by the determination unit, allowing comprehensive analysis while maintaining system manageability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system expands the analysis from two-dimensional (own lane and adjacent lane) to three-dimensional by incorporating longitudinal position information and vehicle speed dimensions, enabling more accurate lane determination through comparison of preset speed with actual vehicle speeds

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

3Measurement precision

If the system performs comprehensive traffic lane determination automatically, then the lane selection accuracy improves, but the processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImproveAccuracy of lane determinationVSAvoidTime for lane determination
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary data collection and preprocessing of vehicle state parameters and traffic conditions continuously, so that when lane determination is needed, the determination unit can quickly process pre-organized information without extensive real-time computation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The determination unit dynamically adjusts the weight and importance of different parameters (vehicle speed, position, lane state) based on current traffic conditions, allowing efficient decision-making by focusing on the most relevant parameters rather than processing all parameters equally

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS10538244B2Driving assistance apparatus
Publication Date: 2020.01.21 DENSO CORP
  • US10538244B2 patent drawing
  • US10538244B2 patent drawing
  • US10538244B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A driving assistance apparatus is mounted in an own vehicle and performs driving assistance for the own vehicle. The driving assistance apparatus determines a travel recommended lane in which the own vehicle is to travel, based on a comparison of a preset vehicle speed set in advance to allow the own vehicle to travel at a constant speed, to a travel state of a preceding vehicle traveling ahead of the own vehicle in a travel lane in which the own vehicle is traveling and a travel state of an adjacent vehicle traveling ahead of the own vehicle in an adjacent lane that is adjacent to the travel lane. The driving assistance apparatus performs output based on the travel recommended lane.