Autonomous Vehicle Lane Closure Detection via Lateral Distance Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in accurately detecting lane closures and shifts, particularly in construction zones where obstacles like cones are used to divert traffic, as existing systems struggle to differentiate between lane blockages and shifts.

Innovation Solution

An autonomous vehicle system that uses sensors like LIDAR, RADAR, or cameras to determine the presence and position of obstacles within a lane, calculates lateral distances, and compares these to pre-determined thresholds to differentiate between lane closures and shifts, allowing for safe navigation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If existing sensor systems are used to detect obstacles, then basic obstacle detection is achieved, but the system cannot accurately differentiate between lane closures and lane shifts

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelane detection accuracyVSAvoidlane status differentiation
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a new dimension of analysis by calculating lateral distance from the lane center to obstacles, transforming the detection from simple presence/absence to spatial relationship analysis. This dimensional addition enables differentiation between lane closures (obstacles near center) and lane shifts (obstacles at edges)

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the parameter being measured from mere obstacle presence to lateral distance from lane center. By comparing this distance parameter against threshold values, the system can distinguish between different lane status conditions (closure vs. shift) that would otherwise be indistinguishable

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If the autonomous vehicle uses simple obstacle presence detection, then the system is computationally efficient, but it cannot provide robust navigation control in construction zones

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigation safetyVSAvoiddetection system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The detection system is segmented into distinct functional components: obstacle presence detection, lateral distance calculation, threshold comparison, and control instruction generation. This modular approach increases reliability through systematic processing while managing complexity through clear separation of functions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Reliability

If the vehicle responds to all detected obstacles by stopping, then safety is maximized, but productivity and efficiency are reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafe operationVSAvoidvehicle throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system uses parameter-based decision making by comparing lateral distance against thresholds to determine appropriate responses. This allows differentiated control actions (continue, slow down, stop) based on the specific geometric parameters of the obstacle configuration, balancing safety with productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables autonomous vehicles to efficiently, accurately, and robustly detect lane closures and shifts, ensuring safe operation through the provision of precise control instructions based on sensor data analysis.

Implementation Method 1

uses sensors like LIDAR, RADAR, or cameras to determine the presence and position of obstacles within a lane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLIDAR: LIDAR

Implementation Method 2

uses sensors like LIDAR, RADAR, or cameras to determine the presence and position of obstacles within a lane

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRADAR: Radar

Data Source

PatentUS8825259B1Detecting lane closures and lane shifts by an autonomous vehicle
Publication Date: 2014.09.02 WAYMO LLC
  • US8825259B1 patent drawing
  • US8825259B1 patent drawing
  • US8825259B1 patent drawing

AI summary

In an example implementation, an autonomous vehicle is configured to detect closures and lane shifts in a lane of travel. The vehicle is configured to operate in an autonomous mode and determine a presence of an obstacle substantially positioned in a lane of travel of the vehicle using a sensor. The lane of travel has a first side, a second side, and a center, and the obstacle is substantially positioned on the first side. The autonomous vehicle includes a computer system. The computer system determines a lateral distance between the obstacle and the center, compares the lateral distance to a pre-determined threshold, and provides instructions to control the autonomous vehicle based on the comparison.