Lane Keeping Control With Delay Compensation and Disturbance Estimation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional lane keeping assistance systems in vehicles, particularly large commercial vehicles, suffer from time delays and model inaccuracies in steering systems, leading to oscillation and performance degradation due to unaccounted time delays and errors in steering angle conversions.

Innovation Solution

A lane keeping control apparatus and method that calculates a lateral control command value by considering time delays and dynamic models, using feedforward and feedback controls, along with a disturbance observer to compensate for steering system errors, thereby improving lane keeping performance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a simple gear ratio conversion is used to convert front-wheel steering angle to steering-wheel steering angle, then the conversion process is simple, but time delay occurs in the steering system leading to oscillation and performance degradation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveconversion process complexityVSAvoidlane keeping stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary action by predicting the future steering-wheel steering angle based on the current front-wheel steering angle and estimated time delay. The controller calculates a predicted steering angle that compensates for the anticipated delay, allowing the system to proactively adjust for the time lag rather than reactively correcting oscillations after they occur. This predictive approach maintains lane keeping stability without requiring complex real-time conversion mechanisms.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Reliability

If a dynamic model is used to account for time delay, then lane keeping performance is improved, but the control system becomes more complex

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelane keeping performanceVSAvoidcontrol system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback by continuously monitoring the actual steering-wheel steering angle and comparing it with the commanded angle. The difference (error) is fed back to the controller, which adjusts the front-wheel steering angle command to compensate for time delay effects. This closed-loop feedback mechanism improves lane keeping performance by actively correcting deviations caused by time delay, while maintaining relatively simple system architecture through straightforward feedback computation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Device complexity

If the steering system time delay is not considered, then the control algorithm is simple, but oscillation occurs and performance degrades

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol algorithm simplicityVSAvoidoscillation and performance degradation
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies preliminary anti-action by introducing a compensatory term in the control algorithm that specifically counteracts the time delay effect. The controller calculates a compensation angle based on the estimated time delay and current steering rate, then adds this compensation to the basic steering command. This preliminary counter-action prevents oscillation and performance degradation by neutralizing the harmful effects of time delay before they manifest as instability, while keeping the overall control algorithm relatively simple through targeted compensation rather than complete redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS12447955B2Apparatus for controlling keeping lane and method thereof
Publication Date: 2025.10.21 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12447955B2 patent drawing
  • US12447955B2 patent drawing
  • US12447955B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In an embodiment a control apparatus includes a processor configured to calculate a target curvature depending on a target path of a vehicle, calculate a first lateral control value based on a feedforward control by using the target curvature, calculate a second lateral control value based on a feedback control by using vehicle information collected from a sensing device of the vehicle, estimate a disturbance by using the vehicle information collected from the sensing device of the vehicle, and calculate a final lateral control command value by summing the first lateral control value, the second lateral control value, and the disturbance and a storage configured to store data and algorithms driven by the processor.