Lane-Keeping Steering Enable Logic for Fewer Unwanted Interventions

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current lane-keeping assistance systems in vehicles frequently intervene with steering, leading to driver annoyance and potential deactivation, reducing traffic safety due to excessive unwanted interventions.

Innovation Solution

Implement a system that only activates steering interventions when clear enabling criteria are met, such as specific driving situations or driver conditions indicating a high benefit potential for preventing unintentional lane departure, rather than intervening in all situations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If active steering intervention is performed in almost all driving maneuvers involving approaching a lane marking line, then warning interventions are carried out in a reliable and reproducible manner, but the frequency of interventions increases significantly causing driver annoyance and potential system deactivation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of warning interventionsVSAvoiddriver acceptance of system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of intervention frequency by introducing enabling criteria that filter when interventions occur. Instead of intervening in all lane marking approaches, the system now evaluates additional parameters (driver attention, driving situation, vehicle speed) to determine whether to activate steering intervention, thereby reducing excessive interventions while maintaining reliability for genuine safety needs

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent inverts the traditional approach by not intervening by default and only intervening when specific enabling criteria are met. Rather than suppressing interventions in exceptional situations, the system now requires positive confirmation that intervention is appropriate, reversing the burden of proof from 'suppress unless necessary' to 'activate unless inappropriate'

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Ease of operation

If further warning suppression criteria are incorporated to reduce unwanted interventions, then driver annoyance is reduced, but the reliability of the system is significantly impaired in situations where unintentional leaving of the lane occurs

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriver acceptance of systemVSAvoidsystem reliability for preventing unintentional lane departure
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the parameter of criterion structure by replacing multiple suppression criteria with a unified enabling criteria framework. Instead of adding layers of suppression rules that complicate the system, it introduces positive enabling conditions (driver attention level, driving situation classification, vehicle speed thresholds) that naturally reduce unwanted interventions while preserving safety-critical interventions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms by continuously monitoring driver attention and driving situation to dynamically adjust intervention behavior. The system uses real-time feedback from sensors (camera, microphone, acceleration sensors) to determine whether enabling criteria are met, creating a closed-loop system that adapts to current conditions rather than relying on static suppression rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Reliability

If the lane-keeping assistance device is activated automatically, then traffic safety is improved through continuous monitoring, but driver acceptance decreases due to frequent unwanted steering interventions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetraffic safety through continuous monitoringVSAvoiddriver acceptance and utilization
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the system dynamic by introducing enabling criteria that cause the intervention behavior to adapt to current driving conditions. The system transitions from static automatic activation to dynamic conditional activation, where the level of assistance provided varies based on real-time assessment of driver attention, driving situation, and vehicle parameters

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the activation parameter from binary (on/off) to conditional (enabled/disabled based on criteria). By introducing enabling criteria that evaluate multiple parameters simultaneously, the system maintains automatic activation for safety while dynamically adjusting intervention frequency to match actual need, thereby preserving both safety and driver acceptance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Data Source

PatentUS11851057B2Method and system for operating a lane-keeping assistance device of a motor vehicle
Publication Date: 2023.12.26 AUDI AG
  • US11851057B2 patent drawing
  • US11851057B2 patent drawing

AI summary

This disclosure relates to a method for operating a lane-keeping assistance device of a motor vehicle including activating a lane-keeping assistance device, and checking whether at least one predefinable enabling criterion for enabling an actuation of the lane-keeping assistance device for triggering a steering intervention is fulfilled in response to a trigger signal for actuating the lane-keeping assistance device for triggering a steering intervention being established. The method includes enabling an actuation of the lane-keeping assistance device for triggering a steering intervention in response to at least one predefinable enabling criterion for enabling an actuation of the lane-keeping assistance device being fulfilled.