Autonomous Lane Merge Navigation Using Lane Mark Classification

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Autonomous vehicles face challenges in navigating lane changes and merges due to the lack of effective systems for identifying lane marks and determining navigational actions based on real-time visual and sensor data.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a system using cameras and processing devices to analyze images, GPS data, and sensor information to identify lane marks, determine their types, and adjust navigational actions for safe and accurate navigation through lane merges and splits.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If autonomous vehicles use basic lane detection systems, then navigation simplicity is maintained, but navigation accuracy and safety deteriorate when facing complex lane merges and splits

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelane mark identification accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments lane mark identification into distinct types (merge, split, straight, curved) by analyzing geometric characteristics of detected lane marks. This segmentation allows the system to handle complex navigation scenarios through structured classification rather than treating all lane marks uniformly, thereby improving accuracy without proportionally increasing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system transitions from basic 2D lane detection to 3D spatial understanding by analyzing the geometric relationships between multiple lane marks in sequence. By incorporating longitudinal and lateral position data, curvature calculations, and merge/split angle measurements, the system creates a multi-dimensional model of lane geometry that enables accurate navigation through complex intersections and merges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Reliability

If the system analyzes multiple image parameters to determine lane mark types, then navigation reliability improves, but processing time and computational load increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigational decision reliabilityVSAvoidimage processing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary classification of lane marks by detecting key geometric features (curvature, angle, position relative to vehicle path) before making navigational decisions. By pre-processing and categorizing lane mark data during the detection phase, the system reduces the computational burden during critical decision-making moments, maintaining reliability while reducing processing time.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where detected lane mark characteristics continuously refine navigation predictions. By comparing detected lane geometry with predicted vehicle trajectories and adjusting navigational decisions in real-time, the system improves reliability through iterative refinement without requiring complete re-analysis of all image parameters at each decision point.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Adaptability or versatility

If the system only detects lane marks without classifying their types, then system simplicity is maintained, but the ability to make appropriate navigational adjustments deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenavigational response adaptabilityVSAvoidlane analysis complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies different analysis methods to different types of lane marks based on their local geometric characteristics. Merge lanes receive specialized analysis focusing on angle and position relative to the host vehicle, while split lanes are analyzed for divergence angles and adjacent lane identification. This localized specialization allows the system to adapt its analysis depth to the specific navigation challenge, improving versatility without uniformly increasing complexity across all scenarios.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS11960293B2Systems and methods for navigating lane merges and lane splits
Publication Date: 2024.04.16 MOBILEYE VISION TECH LTD
  • US11960293B2 patent drawing
  • US11960293B2 patent drawing
  • US11960293B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods are provided for navigating an autonomous vehicle. In one implementation, a system includes a processing device programmed to receive a plurality of images representative of an environment of the host vehicle. The environment includes a road on which the host vehicle is traveling. The at least one processing device is further programmed to analyze the images to identify a target vehicle traveling in a lane of the road different from a lane in which the host vehicle is traveling; analyze the images to identify a lane mark associated with the lane in which the target vehicle is traveling; detect lane mark characteristics of the identified lane mark; use the detected lane mark characteristics to determine a type of the identified lane mark; determine a characteristic of the target vehicle; and determine a navigational action for the host vehicle based on the determined lane mark type and the determined characteristic of the target vehicle.