Vehicle Lane-Keeping Obstacle Avoidance Using a Virtual Rear-Vehicle Line

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Automated lane keeping systems (ALKS) in vehicles may fail to effectively avoid obstacles within the driving lane when lane changes are impossible, leading to potential accidents due to rear vehicles not recognizing the obstacle in time.

Innovation Solution

A vehicle control apparatus and method that generates an avoidance route within the driving lane using a virtual line connecting the rear vehicle to the obstacle, setting drivable avoidance areas, and controlling acceleration or deceleration to allow the vehicle to safely navigate around the obstacle.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If the vehicle changes lane to avoid the obstacle, then the obstacle avoidance capability is improved, but the rear vehicle cannot recognize the obstacle in time leading to potential accidents

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle avoidance capabilityVSAvoidobstacle visibility to rear vehicle
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of information

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary communication system (V2V communication) between the obstacle-detecting vehicle and the rear vehicle. This mediator transmits obstacle information from the first vehicle to the second vehicle, enabling the rear vehicle to recognize the obstacle without requiring lane changes. The communication system acts as a bridge that shares critical safety information across vehicles.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system performs preliminary action by having the first vehicle detect and communicate obstacle information to the rear vehicle before the rear vehicle reaches the obstacle. This advance notification allows the rear vehicle to prepare for potential hazard avoidance measures, such as reducing speed or changing lane, thereby preventing accidents before they occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Stability of the object's composition

If the vehicle maintains lane keeping to improve stability, then the driving stability is improved, but the vehicle cannot avoid obstacles within the driving lane

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedriving stabilityVSAvoidobstacle avoidance capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stability of the object's compositionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic lane keeping that adapts to obstacle conditions. When an obstacle is detected within the driving lane, the system dynamically adjusts the lane keeping behavior by generating an avoidance route that deviates from the standard lane center path. The vehicle maintains stability through controlled deviation rather than abrupt lane changes, balancing stability and obstacle avoidance based on real-time conditions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by proactively planning avoidance routes when obstacles are detected within the driving lane. Instead of waiting for the obstacle to become a critical threat, the system pre-calculates and executes avoidance maneuvers that maintain driving stability while preventing potential collisions. This includes adjusting the vehicle path in advance to clear the obstacle safely.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

3Loss of information

If the vehicle generates avoidance route within driving lane, then the rear vehicle can recognize the obstacle, but the driving stability may be affected by route adjustments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveobstacle visibility to rear vehicleVSAvoiddriving stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of informationVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by having the vehicle make controlled, partial deviations from the lane center to generate avoidance routes, rather than performing excessive actions like full lane changes. These partial path adjustments are sufficient to improve obstacle visibility to the rear vehicle while minimizing disruptions to driving stability. The system carefully calibrates the extent of path deviation to achieve the minimum necessary for obstacle recognition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS12420781B2Apparatus and method for controlling vehicle
Publication Date: 2025.09.23 HYUNDAI MOTOR CO LTD
  • US12420781B2 patent drawing
  • US12420781B2 patent drawing
  • US12420781B2 patent drawing

AI summary

An embodiment vehicle control apparatus includes a sensor configured to obtain a location of an obstacle in a driving lane of a vehicle and a location of a rear vehicle driving in the driving lane and a controller configured to set an avoidance area within the driving lane based on a virtual line connecting the rear vehicle to the obstacle and to generate an avoidance route for the vehicle for avoiding the obstacle based on the avoidance area in response to a determination that it is not possible for the vehicle to change lanes to avoid the obstacle in the driving lane while a driving assistance function is activated.