Lane Region-Based Routing for Autonomous Vehicles

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional routing systems for autonomous vehicles lack efficiency and flexibility in searching for optimal routes, failing to effectively handle lane changes and cover all possible paths.

Innovation Solution

A lane region-based or lane segment-based routing system is implemented, where lanes form a road-level topographic map to mark upstream, downstream, and neighboring lanes, allowing for efficient route decision and planning by identifying all possible routes from a starting point to a destination through lane regions and lane changes between adjacent regions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional routing systems are used for autonomous vehicles, then the system structure is simple, but the routing efficiency and flexibility are insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the routing system into multiple hierarchical levels: road-level routing that determines sequences of roads, and lane-level routing that determines specific lanes within each road. This segmentation allows each level to operate independently with optimized algorithms, improving overall routing efficiency without requiring complete system redesign.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces a two-dimensional routing framework where the first dimension is road-level sequencing and the second dimension is lane-level selection within each road. This dimensional approach enables efficient route planning by separating macro-level path determination from micro-level lane selection, thereby improving productivity without proportionally increasing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Adaptability or versatility

If conventional routing systems are used, then the system is easy to implement, but the ability to handle lane changes and cover all possible paths is insufficient

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelane change handling capabilityVSAvoidrouting system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The routing system is divided into road-level and lane-level components, where the road-level module determines the sequence of roads and the lane-level module handles specific lane selections and changes. This segmentation enables the system to adapt to various lane change scenarios without requiring complete reconfiguration of the entire routing system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements dynamic lane-level routing that can adapt to real-time conditions, allowing the system to handle different lane change scenarios flexibly. The lane-level module can dynamically adjust lane selections based on traffic conditions, road geometry, and vehicle objectives, enhancing adaptability while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Adaptability or versatility

If detailed lane-level routing is implemented, then routing flexibility improves, but computational resource consumption increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverouting flexibilityVSAvoidcomputational resource consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

By segmenting routing into road-level and lane-level tasks, the patent reduces computational burden. The road-level module performs coarse-grained path planning with lower computational requirements, while the lane-level module handles fine-grained lane selections only when necessary, thereby maintaining routing flexibility while reducing overall computational resource consumption.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies lane-level detailed routing only when needed (e.g., at intersections, lane changes, or complex road segments) rather than continuously throughout the entire journey. This partial application of detailed routing maintains flexibility where required while minimizing computational resource consumption during straightforward driving segments.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Data Source

PatentUS10496098B2Road segment-based routing guidance system for autonomous driving vehicles
Publication Date: 2019.12.03 BAIDU USA LLC
  • US10496098B2 patent drawing
  • US10496098B2 patent drawing
  • US10496098B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, a routing request is received for routing an autonomous driving vehicle (ADV) from a source lane to a target lane. One or more road paths are determined from a source road to a target road. The road paths include zero or more intermediate roads in between, where each intermediate road includes one or more intermediate lanes. For each of the road paths, one or more lane paths are determined. Each lane path includes a number of lanes in combination to connect the source lane of the source road to the target lane of the target road via at least one of the intermediate lanes of the intermediate roads. A trajectory is planned from the source plane of the source road to the target lane of the target road using the lane paths to drive the ADV according to the trajectory.