Language Classifier Confidence Scoring for Interface Localization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining a user's preferred language in applications are often inefficient, requiring users to navigate extensive lists or relying on inaccurate guesses based on location or IP address, which can lead to suboptimal language selection.

Innovation Solution

A technique that uses a set of language indicators, such as user location, social network connections, and browser settings, to generate a confidence score for preferred languages, allowing for more accurate prediction and localization of application interfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If applications present a long list of languages for users to select from, then language support coverage is improved, but user interface complexity and navigation difficulty increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanguage support coverageVSAvoiduser interface complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary language detection by analyzing the user's IP address, browser settings, and location data before the user needs to select a language. This preliminary action automatically determines the user's preferred language, eliminating the need for users to navigate through extensive language lists and reducing interface complexity while maintaining broad language support coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The language detection system serves itself by automatically determining user preferences without requiring active user participation. The system uses built-in detection mechanisms (IP address analysis, browser headers, location services) to autonomously identify the user's preferred language, thereby simplifying the user interface while preserving comprehensive language options

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Device complexity

If applications use IP address-based location guessing for language detection, then user interface complexity is reduced, but language detection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser interface complexityVSAvoidlanguage detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system merges multiple language indicator sources (IP address, browser settings, location data, and user profile information) into a comprehensive detection mechanism. By combining these indicators and analyzing them together, the system maintains simplified user interface while significantly improving language detection accuracy through cross-validation and weighted analysis of multiple data sources

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The system incorporates feedback mechanisms that allow users to correct or refine detected language preferences. Users can provide feedback on language detection accuracy, and this feedback is used to update and improve the detection algorithms over time, thereby maintaining high accuracy while keeping the interface simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS8838437B1Language classifiers for language detection
Publication Date: 2014.09.16 GOOGLE LLC
  • US8838437B1 patent drawing
  • US8838437B1 patent drawing
  • US8838437B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for determining one or more preferred languages for a user are provided. The preferred languages may be determined based upon a set of language indicators. The language indicators are analyzed using, for example, rules-based techniques, clustering, language classifiers, and the like, or combinations thereof. Language indicators can include or be derived from information about the user's behavior, location, preferences, social connections, or other data related to the user.