Language Detection via IP and Domain Indicators

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing computer applications face challenges in accurately determining and providing language localization options for users, as they often require users to navigate extensive lists or make educated guesses based on location or IP address, which can be inefficient and inaccurate.

Innovation Solution

The techniques involve obtaining language indicators from various sources, applying rules or classifiers to determine a user's preferred languages, and using confidence scores or clustering to order and select the most likely preferred languages for localization, such as setting language for user interface elements or default input languages.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If applications present a long list of languages for localization, then language support coverage is improved, but user selection complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanguage support coverageVSAvoiduser selection complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary language detection by analyzing the user's IP address, domain, or other indicators to automatically determine the user's preferred language before the user needs to make a selection. This preliminary action eliminates the need for users to navigate extensive language lists, as the system pre-determines the appropriate language based on available indicators.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system enables self-service language detection where the application automatically identifies and applies the user's preferred language without requiring manual intervention. By using IP address analysis, domain information, or other indicators, the system serves itself in determining language preferences, freeing users from the task of manually selecting from long language lists.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Speed

If applications use IP address-based language approximation, then localization speed is improved, but language detection accuracy deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelocalization speedVSAvoidlanguage detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system segments the language detection process into multiple independent components: IP address analysis, domain analysis, and other indicator analysis. Each component provides a signal that can be weighted and combined with others, allowing the system to achieve both speed (through parallel processing of multiple indicators) and accuracy (through combination of multiple signal sources).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system merges multiple language indicators (IP address, domain, and potentially other sources) into a unified language detection result. By combining the information from multiple indicators and applying rules or classifiers to process them together, the system achieves both rapid localization and improved accuracy compared to relying on a single indicator like IP address alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Data Source

PatentUS8788259B1Rules-based language detection
Publication Date: 2014.07.22 GOOGLE LLC
  • US8788259B1 patent drawing
  • US8788259B1 patent drawing
  • US8788259B1 patent drawing

AI summary

Techniques for determining one or more preferred languages for a user are provided. The preferred languages may be determined based upon a set of language indicators. The language indicators are analyzed using, for example, rules-based techniques, clustering, language classifiers, and the like, or combinations thereof. Language indicators can include or be derived from information about the user's behavior, location, preferences, social connections, or other data related to the user.