Language Model Cyber Security System for Communication Authenticity

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing cybersecurity systems struggle to detect malicious, deceptive, inauthentic, or untrustworthy electronic communications that appear legitimate and evade known security procedures.

Innovation Solution

A method and system that utilize a language model to analyze the intent of electronic communications by identifying relevant and irrelevant data, converting the relevant data into a prompt, executing the language model, and outputting a prediction on the communication's authenticity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If traditional cybersecurity procedures are used to detect malicious electronic communications, then the system is easier to operate and requires less computational resources, but the detection accuracy decreases and malicious communications evade detection

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary processing layer that extracts and analyzes specific features (sender information, recipient information, subject line, body text, links, attachments) separately before making a maliciousness determination. This intermediary feature extraction and analysis layer bridges the gap between simple traditional filters and complex AI models, improving detection accuracy while managing system complexity through structured feature processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the electronic communication into distinct components (sender info, recipient info, subject, body, links, attachments) and processes each segment separately with appropriate analysis methods. This segmentation allows the system to apply specialized detection techniques to each component, improving overall detection accuracy while maintaining manageable system complexity through modular processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Measurement precision

If comprehensive analysis of all communication content is performed, then detection accuracy improves, but processing time increases and productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection accuracyVSAvoidprocessing throughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial analysis by focusing on the most critical features (sender verification, subject line analysis, body text scanning for malicious patterns, link validation) rather than exhaustively analyzing every element of the communication. This partial action approach maintains high detection accuracy for malicious content while improving processing throughput by avoiding unnecessary analysis of benign elements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies different analysis depths to different parts of the communication based on their maliciousness indicators. High-priority sections (sender address, subject line, obvious malicious links) receive intensive analysis, while lower-priority sections receive lighter processing. This local quality differentiation improves overall detection accuracy while maintaining processing productivity through optimized resource allocation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250165724A1Cyber security system for electronic communications
Publication Date: 2025.05.22 MCINTYRE NATHAN BRYCE
  • US20250165724A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165724A1 patent drawing
  • US20250165724A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A method including receiving an electronic communication including content. The method also includes identifying, in the content, relevant data including a first portion of the content predetermined to be relevant to an evaluation of authenticity of the electronic communication and irrelevant data including a second portion of the content predetermined to be irrelevant to the evaluation. The method also includes converting the relevant data into a prompt for a language model. The method also includes executing the language model on the prompt. The method also includes outputting, by the language model, a prediction whether the electronic communication is at least one of malicious, deceptive, inauthentic, and untrustworthy.