Language Processing Apparatus for Accurate Cross-Lingual Text Association

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing techniques for generating parallel corpora from comparable corpora face challenges in accurately associating texts across languages due to differences in semantic content, even when sentences have high semantic similarity.

Innovation Solution

The proposed solution involves a language processing program that extracts named entities from texts in different languages, associates texts based on the similarity between these named entities and their alignment probabilities, and outputs association information to improve the accuracy of text alignment.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If texts are associated based on semantic similarity between sentences, then the quantity of associated text pairs increases, but the accuracy of text alignment deteriorates due to differences in semantic content

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequantity of associated text pairsVSAvoidaccuracy of text alignment
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the text association process into two levels: sentence-level semantic similarity matching (for quantity) and named entity-level alignment probability matching (for accuracy). This segmentation allows the system to first identify potential text pairs efficiently, then filter and refine them using named entity correspondence, thereby resolving the contradiction between producing many associations and ensuring their accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Named entities serve as an intermediary mechanism between sentence-level semantic similarity and text-level alignment. The system uses named entity recognition and alignment probability as a mediating layer that bridges the gap between coarse-grained semantic similarity and fine-grained text equivalence, enabling both high productivity and high accuracy in text association.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If named entity extraction and alignment is performed to improve text association accuracy, then the quality of parallel corpus increases, but the processing complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality of parallel corpusVSAvoidprocessing complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary named entity recognition and extraction from source texts before the association process. By pre-identifying and structuring named entities in advance, the system reduces the complexity of the subsequent alignment process, as entities are already segmented and ready for matching, thereby achieving high corpus quality without excessive processing complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The named entity alignment process is designed to be self-service in nature, where the system automatically recognizes, extracts, and aligns named entities without requiring manual intervention. This automation maintains high processing quality while keeping the operational complexity manageable through algorithmic self-processing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If alignment probability between named entities is calculated to improve association accuracy, then the reliability of text pairing increases, but the computational cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of text pairingVSAvoidcomputational cost
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The system applies alignment probability calculation selectively rather than uniformly across all text pairs. By focusing computational resources on local regions where named entities are present and potentially alignable, the system achieves high reliability for text pairing involving named entities while reducing overall computational cost by avoiding unnecessary calculations in regions without named entities.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Data Source

PatentUS20250094719A1Computer-readable recording medium storing language processing program, language processing apparatus, and language processing method
Publication Date: 2025.03.20 FUJITSU LTD
  • US20250094719A1 patent drawing
  • US20250094719A1 patent drawing
  • US20250094719A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A non-transitory computer-readable recording medium stores a language processing program for causing a computer to execute a process including: extracting, from a second text written in a second language, a second named entity corresponding to a first named entity contained in a first text written in a first language; associating the first text with the second text based on a similarity between the first named entity and the second named entity and an alignment probability between the first named entity and the second named entity; and outputting association information indicating a result of associating the first text with the second text.