Language Validation Engine Automates Translation Quality Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Companies face significant challenges and expenses in translating documentation into multiple languages, often resulting in incomplete verification due to the lack of fluent personnel to review all translations.

Innovation Solution

A language validation and linguistic intelligence (LVLI) resource that automates document translation validation using a language validation module (LVM) and linguistic intelligence engine (LIE), which processes source documents to identify and correct language defects, and eventually learns to perform automated translations.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If translation services are used to convert documentation to multiple languages, then language coverage is improved, but translation costs increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelanguage coverageVSAvoidtranslation costs
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of energy

Solution Approach 1:

The translation validation process is segmented into multiple independent modules: language detection module, translation validation module, style guide validation module, and terminology validation module. Each module handles a specific aspect of validation, allowing the system to process translations efficiently without requiring complete manual review of entire documents, thereby reducing costs while maintaining comprehensive language coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary automated validation system that acts as a mediator between machine translation output and final approved translations. This intermediary layer performs preliminary validation checks using style guides and terminology databases, filtering out obvious errors before human review, thus reducing the burden and cost of manual translation services while maintaining high language coverage

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Manufacturing precision

If manual review by fluent personnel is performed to ensure translation accuracy, then translation quality is improved, but the ability to verify all languages decreases due to personnel limitations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetranslation accuracyVSAvoidnumber of verifiable languages
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The translation validation system performs self-service by automatically validating translations against predefined style guides and terminology databases without requiring human fluency in each target language. The system uses automated language detection and comparison algorithms to identify errors, enabling it to verify translations in numerous languages simultaneously without being constrained by the availability of fluent personnel for each language

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The validation system is designed with universal functionality that can handle multiple languages through a single unified platform. The style guide validation module and terminology validation module work across all target languages using the same underlying technology, allowing one system to perform the function of multiple language-specific review teams, thereby increasing the number of verifiable languages while maintaining translation accuracy

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Productivity

If automated validation is implemented to reduce manual intervention, then processing efficiency is improved, but the ability to handle linguistic nuances and style variations worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidlinguistic accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary action by pre-defining style guides and terminology databases for each target language before the validation process begins. These pre-configured reference materials contain linguistic nuances, preferred terminology, and style requirements that guide the automated validation. By having this knowledge prepared in advance, the system can efficiently validate translations while capturing linguistic subtleties that would otherwise require human judgment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The validation system incorporates feedback mechanisms where validation results are used to continuously improve the style guides and terminology databases. When the system encounters edge cases or ambiguous situations during validation, the outcomes are fed back into the reference materials for refinement. This feedback loop enables the automated system to progressively improve its understanding of linguistic nuances and style variations, maintaining high linguistic accuracy while preserving processing efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS10268674B2Linguistic intelligence using language validator
Publication Date: 2019.04.23 DELL PROD LP
  • US10268674B2 patent drawing
  • US10268674B2 patent drawing
  • US10268674B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A language validation system includes a language validation module (LVM) and a linguistic intelligence engine (LIE). The LVM may perform language validation on text in a source document. The LVM may identify a language of origin for each word or sentence in the document. The LVM may determine whether a word/sentence not of the expected language constitutes a true defect. The LVM may provide input to an LIE database as the LVM identifies new words/sentences. The LIE may remain dormant for an initial interval until it obtains a sufficient vocabulary. Eventually, the LIE may be sufficiently knowledgeable to perform automated translations requests to translate original documents in the original language into one or more source documents in one or more source language. The LIE may adapt or otherwise implement a particular style in accordance with a style guide or analogous information.