Solvent-Free Lanthanide Oxide Nanoparticle Synthesis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for synthesizing CeO2 and doped lanthanide oxide nanoparticles rely on solvent-based techniques, which are complex, unsuitable for large-scale production, and lack control over morphology, size, and crystalline phase, limiting their scalability and efficiency.

Innovation Solution

The use of microwave-assisted and conventional thermal solid-state synthesis with cerium tri(methylsilyl)amide-based precursors allows for the production of uniform spherical nanoparticles, eliminating the need for solvents and enabling control over size, morphology, and crystallinity through varying reaction conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of manufacture

If solvent-based techniques are used for synthesizing CeO2 and doped lanthanide oxide nanoparticles, then the synthesis process can proceed with commercially available precursors, but the process becomes complex and unsuitable for large-scale production

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesynthesis process simplicityVSAvoidscalability for large-scale production
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes solvents from the synthesis process by using solid-state reaction methodology. This extraction of the solvent component simplifies the overall process by eliminating solvent removal steps, filtration, and drying operations, thereby enabling direct scalable production of lanthanide oxide nanoparticles without the complexity associated with solvent-based techniques

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the chemical mechanism of solvent-based synthesis with a thermal mechanism using microwave irradiation and conventional heating. This substitution transforms the synthesis approach from solution chemistry to solid-state chemistry, eliminating the need for solvents while maintaining effective precursor decomposition and nanoparticle formation, thus improving both simplicity and scalability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Shape

If solvent-based techniques are used with varying pH, precursors, and surfactants to control morphology, then some morphological control can be achieved, but the process complexity increases and washing procedures become cumbersome

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemorphology control of nanoparticlesVSAvoidsynthesis process complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ShapeVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes surfactants and pH adjustment agents from the synthesis process by employing solid-state reaction. This extraction eliminates the need for complex washing procedures to remove residual surfactants and simplifies the process by removing pH control steps, while still achieving morphological control through the inherent properties of the solid-state reaction and precursor selection

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The solid-state reaction process is self-sufficient in achieving morphological control without requiring external additives like surfactants or pH adjusters. The morphology control emerges naturally from the solid-state decomposition and reaction mechanisms, eliminating the need for complex process controls and subsequent washing steps to remove additives

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of manufacture

If conventional thermal methods are used for synthesis, then the process is simple to implement, but the reaction time is long and energy efficiency is low

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess implementation simplicityVSAvoidreaction time
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs microwave irradiation which provides periodic electromagnetic energy input to the reaction system. This periodic energy delivery enables rapid heating and decomposition of precursors, significantly reducing reaction time compared to continuous conventional thermal heating, while maintaining ease of implementation through standard microwave equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes the phase transition capabilities of microwave heating to rapidly transform the thermal state of precursors. Microwave irradiation induces rapid heating and phase changes in the solid precursors, accelerating the decomposition and reaction processes, thereby reducing reaction time while keeping the process simple and equipment-accessible

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

4Productivity

If solid-state synthesis is used to eliminate solvents, then scalability is improved and process complexity is reduced, but control over initial morphology and crystalline phase becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescalability of productionVSAvoidcontrol over initial morphology
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSShape

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality control by selecting specific precursors with defined molecular structures and stoichiometries that inherently guide the formation of desired nanoparticle morphologies and crystalline phases. The local chemical environment created by the solid-state reaction of these tailored precursors enables morphology control without requiring global process complexities like surfactants or pH adjustment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent controls morphology and crystalline phase by adjusting reaction parameters such as temperature, heating rate, and dwell time in the solid-state synthesis process. These parameter changes in the thermal profile of the microwave or conventional heating process enable precise control over nanoparticle formation, maintaining scalability while achieving desired morphological outcomes

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the scalable production of high-purity, stoichiometric lanthanide oxide nanoparticles with tailored physical properties, such as spherical morphology and controlled size, facilitating their use in applications like sensors and fuel cells.

Implementation Method 1

microwave assisted and conventional thermal solid-state synthesis

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMicrowave heating: Dielectric Heating

Implementation Method 2

conventional thermal solid-state synthesis with cerium tri(methylsilyl)amide-based precursors allows for the production of uniform spherical nanoparticles

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal decomposition: Pyrolysis

Data Source

PatentUS11718536B2Solvent-free synthesis of lanthanide oxide and mixed lanthanide oxide nanoparticles
Publication Date: 2023.08.08 NATIONAL TECHNOLOGY & ENGINEERING SOLUTIONS OF SANDIA LLC
  • US11718536B2 patent drawing
  • US11718536B2 patent drawing
  • US11718536B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Lanthanide oxides and mixed lanthanide oxides can be produced using furnace or microwave assisted solid-state synthesis. The use of Ln-tri(methylsilyl)amide-based precursors yields spherical nanoparticles. The formation of spherical shaped nanoparticles is likely due to the preferential single-step decomposition of the Ln-TMS as well as the low activation energy to overcome decomposition. Reaction temperature, initial metal ion ratio, and reaction dwell time can be used to control the final nanoparticle size. The method enables solvent-free, high-yield synthesis of morphology-controlled lanthanide oxides.