Self-Retracting Lanyard with Fall Detection and Controlled Descent

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional self-retracting lanyards do not provide adequate warning to users approaching dangerous locations and lack a means for users to initiate controlled descent without assistance after a fall, leading to potential injuries and increased rescue costs due to the need for separate harness-based devices.

Innovation Solution

A self-retracting lanyard system with an alarm device that detects angles relative to a vertical axis and generates alerts, and a manual control allowing users to initiate controlled descent, integrated with a wearable electronic device for emergency communication and rescue assistance.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If conventional self-retracting lanyards are used without additional warning devices, then the device complexity is low, but the reliability of fall prevention is insufficient due to lack of warning to users approaching dangerous locations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefall prevention reliabilityVSAvoidlanyard system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent combines the warning function and communication function into the existing lanyard system by integrating an alarm device that detects angle changes and a wireless transmitter that sends alerts to a mobile device. This merging approach enhances fall prevention reliability by providing proactive warnings without requiring completely separate warning systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The lanyard system is enhanced with multi-functionality by incorporating both angle detection for warning purposes and wireless communication capabilities. The same lanyard structure serves both its original fall arrest function and the new warning/communication functions, reducing the need for entirely separate devices.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

2Reliability

If separate harness-based rescue devices are used, then the reliability of rescue operation is improved, but the device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improverescue operation reliabilityVSAvoidrescue system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the rescue initiation capability into the lanyard system itself through a manual control mechanism that the user can operate to trigger controlled descent. This eliminates the need for separate harness-based rescue devices while maintaining reliable rescue operation through integrated control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The lanyard system enables self-service rescue by allowing the user to independently initiate controlled descent through the manual control mechanism. The user can self-rescue without requiring external assistance or separate rescue equipment, improving reliability while reducing system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Ease of operation

If no manual control for controlled descent is provided, then the device complexity is low, but the ease of operation is reduced because users cannot initiate descent without assistance

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrolled descent initiationVSAvoidcontrol mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The manual control mechanism enables users to independently initiate controlled descent without requiring assistance from others. This self-service capability significantly improves ease of operation by allowing users to control their own descent, while the control mechanism itself remains relatively simple in design.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system provides timely warnings to users approaching unsafe zones, enables self-initiated controlled descent, and facilitates emergency communication, reducing the risk of injury and rescue costs by integrating alert and communication functionalities within the lanyard.

Implementation Method 1

an accelerometer, a processor or programmable circuit, and a non-transitory program storage medium on which are stored instructions executable by the processor or programmable circuit to perform operations including receiving a measurement from the accelerometer, comparing the measurement to a threshold, detecting that the user of the self-retracting lanyard has fallen based on a result of the comparing

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAccelerometer: Accelerometer

Data Source

PatentUS11266862B2Self-retracting lanyard with fall protection harness tracker
Publication Date: 2022.03.08 THOMPSON JEFFREY D
  • US11266862B2 patent drawing
  • US11266862B2 patent drawing
  • US11266862B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A self-retracting lanyard system includes a self-retracting lanyard having a main body and a retractable line, a harness connected to the retractable line and wearable by the user of the self-retracting lanyard, and an electronic device disposable on the harness. The electronic device includes an accelerometer, a processor or programmable circuit, and a non-transitory program storage medium on which are stored instructions executable by the processor or programmable circuit to perform operations including receiving a measurement from the accelerometer, comparing the measurement to a threshold, detecting that the user of the self-retracting lanyard has fallen based on a result of the comparing, and instructing a wireless transmitter to transmit a wireless signal in response to the detection that the user has fallen.