Laparoscopic Sealer Bias Force Control for Vessel Size Variation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing medical devices, such as forceps, are limited by a fixed maximum force that cannot be altered by the user, necessitating device switching for varying tissue sizes, which increases surgery duration and complexity.

Innovation Solution

A medical device with a variable motion transfer assembly allows users to adjust the maximum bias force applied by the jaws through a compressible member, such as a spring, using a user-positionable seat and adjustable components like a hex nut or cam lever, enabling continuous or discrete force adjustments.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If a fixed maximum force is used in existing forceps, then the device structure is simple, but the adaptability to different tissue sizes is limited and requires switching devices

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different tissue sizesVSAvoiddevice structure complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The forceps incorporates a dynamic force adjustment mechanism where a compressible member (spring) can be compressed by a user-positionable seat to vary the maximum bias force in real-time. This allows the device to adapt to different tissue sizes during surgery without switching devices, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and device structure complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The invention changes the force parameter by allowing users to adjust the compression of the spring member, thereby varying the maximum bias force applied by the jaws. This parameter adjustment capability enables the same device to handle different tissue sizes effectively, improving adaptability while maintaining a relatively simple overall structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If device switching is required for varying tissue sizes, then each device can be optimized for specific use, but surgery duration and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesurgery efficiencyVSAvoidsurgery time
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The forceps is designed with multi-functionality through the variable force adjustment mechanism, enabling a single device to perform effectively across multiple tissue size scenarios. This eliminates the need to switch between different forceps for different vessel sizes, thereby reducing surgery time and improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The force adjustment mechanism is pre-configured within the device structure, allowing surgeons to quickly adjust the maximum bias force during surgery without needing to prepare or switch to different devices. This preliminary preparation of the adjustment mechanism within the device itself reduces surgery time and improves efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Reliability

If higher force is applied to seal larger vessels, then sealing effectiveness improves, but thermal spread and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesealing effectivenessVSAvoidgenerator energy use
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The invention allows precise adjustment of the force parameter through spring compression, enabling the application of exactly the right amount of force needed for each vessel size. This prevents excessive force application that would lead to unnecessary thermal spread and energy consumption, while still achieving reliable sealing effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of always applying maximum force, the invention enables partial action by allowing force adjustment to match the actual sealing needs of different vessel sizes. This avoids excessive force application and the associated increased thermal spread and energy consumption, while maintaining adequate sealing effectiveness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables efficient sealing and cutting of vessels of varying sizes without needing additional instruments, optimizing generator energy use, reducing surgery time, and minimizing thermal spread.

Implementation Method 1

A compressible member can be aligned with the longitudinal shaft. The compressible member can be configured for applying a variable maximum bias force for communication to the end effector.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring compression: Spring

Data Source

PatentUS20260069302A1Variable maximum force laparoscopic sealer and divider
Publication Date: 2026.03.12 GYRUS ACMI INC
  • US20260069302A1 patent drawing
  • US20260069302A1 patent drawing
  • US20260069302A1 patent drawing

AI summary

A medical device such as a surgical forceps is usable with at least two different jaw forces. The device can include a longitudinal shaft, having a proximal portion and a distal portion. An end effector can be attached to and can extend from the distal portion. A compressible member can be aligned with the longitudinal shaft. The compressible member can be configured for applying a variable maximum bias force for communication to the end effector. An end-user-positionable seat can be located against a first end of the compressible member. The seat can be actuatable by the end-user for varying the variable maximum bias force.