Adjustable Laparoscopic Handle Pivot Mechanism

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing laparoscopic surgical instruments often force surgeons into non-ergonomic positions, limiting comfort and increasing the risk of physical harm due to handle designs that are dependent on the end effector's position and orientation.

Innovation Solution

A surgical instrument with a handle section that includes a first and second pivot, allowing the handle to pivot independently of the working shaft section, with a ratcheting mechanism and locking system to maintain ergonomic positions and prevent excessive movement.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If the handle position and orientation are tied to the end effector position and orientation, then the instrument structure is simplified, but the surgeon is forced into non-ergonomic positions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveergonomic positionVSAvoidhandle independence
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The instrument is divided into independent segments: the handle section can pivot independently from the working shaft section via the first pivot, and the first handle can pivot independently from the second handle via the second pivot. This segmentation allows each section to be positioned ergonomically without being constrained by the position of other sections, resolving the contradiction between ergonomic operation and structural simplicity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The instrument incorporates dynamic pivot joints that allow the handle section and handles to be adjusted to different positions and orientations during the procedure. The ratcheting mechanism provides dynamic locking at selected positions, enabling the surgeon to optimize ergonomics while maintaining structural control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

2Ease of operation

If the handle section is made pivotable independent of the working shaft, then ergonomic positions are achieved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandle adjustabilityVSAvoidpivot and locking mechanism
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The ratcheting mechanism is designed to be self-latching, automatically maintaining the selected handle position without requiring continuous active control or additional power sources. The surgeon simply releases and repositions the handle, and the mechanism self-locks, reducing the need for complex active control systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple pivot points are added to the handle, then ergonomic flexibility is improved, but the structural complexity and potential failure points increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvehandle positioning flexibilityVSAvoidmechanical stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of using continuous active locking mechanisms that could fail, the design inverts the approach by using passive ratcheting mechanisms that inherently maintain position. The ratchets engage to prevent unwanted movement while allowing controlled repositioning, improving reliability by eliminating the need for continuous active control at multiple pivot points.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables surgeons to maintain ergonomic positions during procedures, reducing physical strain and improving comfort by allowing independent adjustment of the handle orientation relative to the working shaft, while maintaining the end effector's functional state.

Implementation Method 1

the latch release cavity comprises a spring detent to bias the translational movement of the second handle pivot pin

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpring: Spring

Implementation Method 2

the ratcheting mechanism includes a release member pivotably connected to a ratchet body and the ratchet body includes a first ramp

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRatchet: Ratchet

Implementation Method 3

a wedge member is disposed between the first ramp and the second ramp and the release member to interact with the first ramp and the second ramp, the wedge member being biased in a distal direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectWedge: Wedge

Data Source

PatentEP2675371B1Adjustable laparoscopic instrument handle
Publication Date: 2020.10.21 IMDS LLC
  • EP2675371B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP2675371B1 patent drawingFigure 2
  • EP2675371B1 patent drawingFigure 3

AI summary

Instrument handles are adjustable relative to an end effector of the instrument. The handles may be releasably locked in selected positions and/or orientations relative to the end effector. When the lock is released, the handles may be moved to a different position and/or orientation relative to the end effector, and locked in place. The handles may pivot relative to the end effector around one or more joints. The handles may pivot about an axis of a hinge joint or a point of a ball and socket joint. The axis of the hinge joint may be aligned parallel or perpendicular to a center longitudinal axis of the end effector, or of a shaft between the handles and the end effector.