Large File Upload Workflow Using Chunking and User Entitlements

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing application programming interfaces (APIs) for file upload are limited by file size, often supporting only up to 10 MB, leading to frequent failures and requiring labor-intensive reintegration for new users, and traditional hard-coding methods are inefficient for managing user-dependent upload processes.

Innovation Solution

A system and method for large file upload that includes chunking files into smaller sizes, processing them in a distributed computing environment, and managing upload procedures based on user entitlements, with event history tracking and configurable notification protocols.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional API integration methods are used for file upload, then the system can support file uploads, but the file upload size is limited to 10 MB and failures occur frequently

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefile upload reliabilityVSAvoidfile upload size capability
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides large files into smaller chunks (e.g., 10 MB segments) before upload. Each chunk is uploaded separately through the API, then reassembled on the server side. This segmentation allows the system to handle files of any size while maintaining compatibility with API limitations, thereby improving both reliability and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces an intermediary file upload service that acts as a mediator between the user and the document management system. This service manages the chunking, upload, and reassembly process, absorbing the complexity and preventing direct API failures from affecting the core system. The intermediary layer improves reliability by handling errors gracefully and maintaining upload state information.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

2Adaptability or versatility

If hard-coding methods are used to plan upload processes based on user roles, then the upload process can be customized, but the system requires continuous reintegration and recoding when new users are added

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveuser-specific upload configurationVSAvoidsystem integration complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic configuration where upload processes are determined by user entitlements and roles stored in the database. When a user uploads a file, the system queries the user's entitlements and automatically adjusts the upload process accordingly. This dynamic approach eliminates the need for hard-coding and reintegration when new users or roles are added, as the system adapts automatically based on stored configuration data.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the approach from fixed hard-coded processes to parameter-driven processes. User entitlements, roles, and upload configurations are stored as modifiable parameters in the database. This allows administrators to configure upload behaviors for different user types without modifying the codebase, reducing integration complexity while maintaining adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If existing API integration methods are used, then file upload can be performed, but fault points lead to upload failures downstream

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveupload process efficiencyVSAvoidupload success rate
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements beforehand cushioning by pre-uploading files to a staging area database before final processing. This intermediate storage acts as a buffer, allowing the system to recover from downstream failures without losing the uploaded data. The event history tracking also provides early warning of potential issues, enabling preventive actions before failures occur.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements comprehensive feedback mechanisms through event history tracking that monitors each stage of the upload process. The system tracks events from file reception through processing to final storage, providing feedback loops that enable automatic error detection, recovery, and notification. This feedback system improves reliability by identifying and correcting issues before they propagate through the system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS12566732B2Systems and methods for large file upload, configurable with user workflows
Publication Date: 2026.03.03 WELLS FARGO BANK NA
  • US12566732B2 patent drawing
  • US12566732B2 patent drawing
  • US12566732B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Systems and methods for large file upload, configurable with user workflows are disclosed. An upload service can receive a data file including metadata associated with a user, then upload the data file to a first database within a distributed computing environment. The upload service may identify an entitlement associated with the user based on the metadata and upload the data file to a second database. The upload service may determine a notification protocol based in part on the entitlement associated with the user, then generate one or more notifications based on the notification protocol. Each action performed by the upload service may be recorded and used to determine an event history of the data file. The upload service can store the event history.