Large Flow Pinning for Network Load-Balancing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional load-balancing methods in computer networks, which rely on hash algorithms, often fail to maintain uniform bandwidth distribution due to the presence of large and small flows, leading to congestion at network interfaces.

Innovation Solution

A method and apparatus that identify large flows, measure their bandwidth, and pin them to specific output interfaces, while using a conventional load-balancing process for remaining small flows, thereby ensuring uniform bandwidth distribution across interfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If conventional load-balancing using hash algorithms is applied to all flows, then the load-balancing process is simple and easy to implement, but uniform bandwidth distribution cannot be maintained due to large flows causing congestion

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveload-balancing implementation simplicityVSAvoidbandwidth distribution uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments flows into two categories: large flows and small flows. Large flows are handled separately through local placement and pinning to specific interfaces, while small flows continue to use conventional hash-based load balancing. This segmentation resolves the contradiction by applying different handling mechanisms to different flow types, achieving both simplicity for small flows and precision for large flows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality by treating large flows differently from small flows. Large flows are pinned to specific output interfaces based on their characteristics, while small flows use uniform hash-based distribution. This differential treatment ensures that large flows receive specialized handling for uniform bandwidth distribution, while small flows benefit from simple conventional load balancing.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Manufacturing precision

If large flows are handled separately with local placement and pinning, then bandwidth distribution uniformity is improved, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebandwidth distribution uniformityVSAvoidload-balancing mechanism complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts large flows from the conventional load-balancing process and handles them separately through local placement and pinning mechanisms. By taking out large flows from the general hash-based balancing, the system can apply specialized handling to achieve uniform bandwidth distribution without complicating the entire load-balancing mechanism.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies partial action by implementing local placement and pinning only for large flows, while leaving small flows with conventional load balancing. This partial application of advanced techniques only where needed (for large flows) achieves improved bandwidth distribution without excessively complicating the overall system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

3Speed

If all flows are load-balanced using hash algorithms, then processing speed is fast and simple, but congestion occurs at network interfaces due to large volume flows

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveflow processing speedVSAvoidinterface congestion
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent extracts large flows from the conventional hash-based load balancing process and handles them separately through local placement. This extraction prevents large flows from causing congestion in the standard load-balancing path, while small flows continue to be processed quickly through the simple hash algorithm, thus maintaining high processing speed while eliminating congestion.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies preliminary action by identifying and pinning large flows to specific interfaces before they can cause congestion. By proactively placing large flows on designated paths with available bandwidth, the system prevents interface congestion before it occurs, while maintaining fast processing for all flows.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS8738752B2Local placement of large flows to assist load-balancing
Publication Date: 2014.05.27 CISCO TECHNOLOGY INC
  • US8738752B2 patent drawing
  • US8738752B2 patent drawing
  • US8738752B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In one embodiment, an apparatus generally comprises one or more input interfaces for receiving a plurality of flows, a plurality of output interfaces, and a processor operable to identify large flows and select one of the output interfaces for each of the large flows to load-balance the large flows over the output interfaces. The apparatus further includes memory for storing a list of the large flows, a pinning mechanism for pinning the large flows to the selected interfaces, and a load-balance mechanism for selecting one of the output interfaces for each of the remaining flows. A method for local placement of large flows to assist in load-balancing is also disclosed.