Large Silicon Nitride Ceramic Bearing Elements via Spark Plasma Sintering

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for manufacturing large ceramic components, such as rolling bearing elements, face challenges in achieving homogeneous microstructures, high mechanical properties, and cost-effectiveness due to high energy consumption, long production cycles, and inhomogeneous structures, particularly in spark plasma sintering which requires expensive treatments and is not compatible with larger component sizes.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using spark plasma sintering (SPS) with rapid heating and short holding times, applying pressures between 5 and 150 MPa, and controlling sintering temperatures to achieve fully or near fully dense structures with minimal porosity and secondary phases, allowing for the production of large ceramic components with tailored microstructures and improved mechanical properties without the need for organic additives or encapsulation.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional sintering methods (HIP or GPS) are used for large ceramic components, then high density and mechanical properties are achieved, but production cycle time and energy consumption increase exponentially

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedensity homogeneityVSAvoidproduction cycle time
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies periodic pulsed electric current (spark plasma) during sintering instead of continuous heating. The pulsed nature of the current delivers energy in short bursts, enabling rapid heating and cooling cycles that achieve full densification in minutes rather than hours, directly resolving the contradiction between density quality and production speed

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent fundamentally changes the sintering parameters by applying high electric current densities (10-100 kA/m²) in pulsed form, combined with controlled pressure (1-100 MPa), to achieve ultra-rapid sintering. This parameter transformation enables large components to be sintered in 5-30 minutes while maintaining homogeneous microstructure and full density

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If spark plasma sintering is used for large components, then production time is reduced, but expensive treatments and encapsulation are required

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesintering speedVSAvoidprocess complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSEase of manufacture

Solution Approach 1:

The patent removes the requirement for encapsulation of powder in capsules during SPS processing. By eliminating this complex preparatory step and the associated costly equipment, the process becomes simpler and more suitable for large component production while maintaining high sintering speeds and material quality

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces expensive encapsulation materials and complex HIP equipment with simple, disposable graphite die systems that can be easily replaced. This substitution dramatically reduces equipment costs and process complexity while maintaining the rapid sintering capability for large components

Inventive Principle:
Principle #27Cheap short-living objects (Disposable)

3Volume of moving object

If larger component sizes are produced by conventional methods, then component size increases, but inhomogeneous structures and defects increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomponent sizeVSAvoidmicrostructure homogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
Volume of moving objectVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies pressure during the sintering process to close surface pores and densify the green body before the final heating stage. This preliminary densification action ensures that even large components achieve homogeneous microstructure without internal defects, resolving the contradiction between size and structural uniformity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the production of high-quality ceramic components with excellent mechanical stability and reduced energy consumption, achieving densities over 99% and producing components larger than 30 mm in size with enhanced hardness and fracture toughness, while minimizing defects and production time.

Implementation Method 1

heating the material with a pulsed electrical energy, going through the punches and the electrically conducting die

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectJoule heating: Joule Heating

Implementation Method 2

applying a uniaxial pressure on the two electrically conducting punches of the graphite chamber, thereby applying a pressure on the material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCompression: Compression

Implementation Method 3

The spark plasma sintering technique (SPS) is used for manufacturing the ceramic components

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSpark plasma sintering: Spark Plasma Sintering

Data Source

PatentUS8772190B2Large ceramic component and method of manufacture
Publication Date: 2014.07.08 AB SKF SKF PATENT DEPARTMENT
  • US8772190B2 patent drawing
  • US8772190B2 patent drawing
  • US8772190B2 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention concerns a sintered ceramic component of silicon nitride or sialon suitable as rolling element in a bearing and a manufacturing method for making such ceramic components. The ceramic component has high density and a homogeneous and fine microstructure, giving the component excellent mechanical properties. Manufacturing of the sintered ceramic component by SPS is cost-effective and rapid.