Authentication System for Large Wager Thresholds

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current wagering platforms lack a system to authenticate large bets, fail to set user preferences for reconfirmation of large wagers, and do not prompt users to identify themselves upon placing large wagers quickly, leading to potential impulsive decisions.

Innovation Solution

A system that includes a settings module for users to set wager thresholds and authentication preferences, a verify module to request authentication if thresholds are exceeded, and an authenticate module to verify user identity through numeric or biometric means, ensuring that users are prompted to confirm large bets.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Ease of operation

If a wagering platform allows users to place large bets without authentication, then the ease of operation is improved, but the reliability of wagering decisions deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of placing betsVSAvoidreliability of wagering decisions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary authentication actions before allowing large bets to be placed. When a wager exceeds the predefined threshold, the platform requires user verification through biometric or security code authentication before the bet is finalized, preventing impulsive or unauthorized wagering decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system provides feedback to users when their wager approaches or exceeds the threshold amount. The platform displays notifications and prompts users to confirm their identity, creating a feedback loop that ensures users are aware of the large bet amount and intentionally confirm their decision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Reliability

If a wagering platform implements authentication for large bets, then the reliability of wagering decisions is improved, but the device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of wagering decisionsVSAvoidcomplexity of wagering system
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The authentication mechanism is applied locally only to wagers that exceed the predefined threshold amount. The system dynamically adjusts its behavior based on the wager size, applying complex authentication procedures only when necessary for large bets while keeping the system simple for常规-sized wagers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication module serves multiple functions: it verifies user identity, confirms wager intent, prevents fraudulent activity, and provides an audit trail. This multi-functional approach consolidates what could be separate complex systems into a single unified authentication mechanism

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If a wagering platform requires authentication for all bets, then the reliability of wagering decisions is improved, but the productivity of the platform deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvereliability of wagering decisionsVSAvoidspeed of wagering transactions
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary authentication actions before allowing large bets to be placed. When a wager exceeds the predefined threshold, the platform requires user verification through biometric or security code authentication before the bet is finalized, preventing impulsive or unauthorized wagering decisions

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The authentication mechanism is applied locally only to wagers that exceed the predefined threshold amount. The system dynamically adjusts its behavior based on the wager size, applying complex authentication procedures only when necessary for large bets while keeping the system simple for常规-sized wagers

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

4Ease of operation

If a wagering platform does not prompt users to identify themselves, then the ease of operation is improved, but the accountability of large bets deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of placing betsVSAvoidaccountability of wagering decisions
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of operationVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system provides feedback to users when their wager approaches or exceeds the threshold amount. The platform displays notifications and prompts users to confirm their identity, creating a feedback loop that ensures users are aware of the large bet amount and intentionally confirm their decision

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Data Source

PatentUS11663883B2Method, system and apparatus to authenticate large bets
Publication Date: 2023.05.30 ADRENALINE IP
  • US11663883B2 patent drawing
  • US11663883B2 patent drawing
  • US11663883B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A system that allows a user to set threshold preferences for wager limits and the amount of time a wager is placed to allow the user to authenticate or identify themselves when the thresholds are exceeded to reconfirm that the user wishes to place a wager. The system compares the wagers placed by the user to thresholds inputted by the user. If the wager parameters exceed the inputted thresholds, the wagering network reconfirms the wager with the user by requesting a means of authentication to ensure that it is the user placing the wager and determining if the user wants to place the wager and that it was not placed in error.