Laser Ablation of Nuclear Plant Paint Coatings

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current laser ablation methods for decontaminating nuclear facility walls are inefficient due to high costs, dust generation, waste production, and re-deposition of ablated material, which complicates the process and increases operating constraints.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a stationary deflection head with a beam quality M² < 20 to control pulsed laser beams, ensuring disjoint or contiguous impact zones with minimized overlap, and adjusting energy per pulse to achieve efficient ablation with reduced waste and re-deposition, using a galvanometric mirror system for precise beam deflection and focusing.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If high power pulsed lasers are used to improve ablation efficiency, then ablation speed increases, but re-deposition of ablated material worsens

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveablation speedVSAvoidre-deposition of ablated material
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent uses pulsed laser action with specific pulse duration (nanosecond to microsecond range) and repetition rate control. The periodic pulsing allows ablated material to be ejected between pulses rather than accumulating and re-depositing during continuous irradiation, resolving the contradiction between ablation speed and re-deposition.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent optimizes multiple laser parameters including pulse duration, repetition rate, and fluence to achieve efficient ablation while minimizing re-deposition. By adjusting these parameters within specific ranges, the system maintains high ablation speed while preventing harmful re-deposition effects.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Manufacturing precision

If the firing head is located in immediate vicinity of the layer to be ablated, then ablation precision improves, but protection of optical systems from ablation products becomes more difficult

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveablation precisionVSAvoidprotection of optical systems
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a remote coupling system where the laser beam is transmitted through optical fibers to a focal point near the workpiece. The optical fiber acts as an intermediary, allowing the laser source to be positioned away from the ablation zone while maintaining precise beam delivery to the target surface.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The system separates the laser generation unit from the ablation interaction zone using optical fiber transmission. This segmentation allows the complex optical systems to be protected remotely while maintaining precise beam focusing at the workpiece surface through the fiber optic intermediary.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

3Productivity

If multiple superimposed firings are used to improve ablation efficiency, then material removal increases, but re-deposition of ablated material increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal rateVSAvoidre-deposition of ablated material
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs periodic pulsed laser firing with controlled repetition rates. The timing between pulses is optimized so that ablated material is cleared from the interaction zone before subsequent pulses arrive, preventing re-deposition while maintaining high material removal rates through multiple passes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent achieves continuous effective ablation through high repetition rate pulsing, where pulses are delivered continuously but spaced appropriately to allow material ejection. This maintains uninterrupted ablation action while preventing harmful re-deposition by ensuring each pulse acts on freshly exposed material.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach reduces waste generation, minimizes re-deposition, and enhances ablation efficiency by optimizing beam quality and energy distribution, allowing for faster and cleaner decontamination of nuclear facility walls with lower power requirements.

Implementation Method 1

laser ablation, which consists in removing a layer of reduced thickness of the contaminating material to be removed, via the interaction of a coherent and focused light coming from a pulsed laser with this material. The rapid heating of the surface of this layer causes the vaporization then the ejection of the first strata of the material.

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser ablation: Laser Ablation

Implementation Method 2

The rapid heating of the surface of this layer causes the vaporization then the ejection of the first strata of the material

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectAbsorption (EM radiation): Absorption (EM radiation)

Data Source

PatentEP1899082B1Method and device for laser ablation of a surface coating from a wall, such as a coat of paint in a nuclear plant
Publication Date: 2016.08.17 COMMISSARIAT A LENERGIE ATOMIQUE ET AUX ENERGIES ALTERNATIVES
  • EP1899082B1 patent drawingFigure 1
  • EP1899082B1 patent drawingFigure 2~3
  • EP1899082B1 patent drawing

AI summary

The invention concerns a method for laser ablation of a surface coating from a wall, such as a painted wall finish, for example in a nuclear plant to be decontaminated, and a device for implementing said method. The inventive ablation method includes sweeping shots on the coating of at least one pulsed laser beam with a laser beam quality factor M2 less than 20, and characterized in that it comprises a direct control of said shots by optical deflection, such that the impact zones (I1, I2, I3, ) of said shots on said coating are disjointed or substantially adjacent with minimized overlapping.