Laser Processing Simulation Using Deep Learning for Ablation Prediction
Find Innovative SolutionsGenerate Solutions
Solution Overview
Problem
Existing laser processing systems struggle to accurately estimate the degree of ablation processing and determine optimal laser beam parameters due to non-linear relationships between irradiation pulses and fluence, lacking learning on the material and beam parameter interactions with the processing object before and after irradiation.
Innovation Solution
A machine learning method using deep learning to establish relationships between the material of the processing object, laser beam parameters, and pre- and post-processed part data to predict the outcome of laser processing, enabling simulation and control of laser processing systems for enhanced accuracy.
Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles
Engineering Contradiction Analysis
1Manufacturing precision
If conventional laser processing control methods are used, then the processing can be performed with simple parameters, but the accuracy of estimating ablation degree and determining optimal parameters is insufficient due to non-linear relationships
Solution Approach 1:
The patent introduces machine learning models as an intermediary between laser processing parameters and ablation outcomes. The learning unit acquires datasets of laser processing conditions and ablation results, then uses neural networks or other ML algorithms to learn the non-linear relationships. This intermediary system translates complex non-linear parameter interactions into accurate predictions of ablation degree, resolving the contradiction by handling complexity internally while providing precise output.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent transforms the approach by changing from direct parameter control to parameter learning. Instead of relying on predefined linear relationships between parameters, the system collects extensive processing data and uses machine learning to automatically discover optimal parameter settings. The learning unit adjusts model parameters based on training data, enabling accurate prediction of ablation outcomes without manually modeling complex non-linear relationships.
2Manufacturing precision
If machine learning is used to learn laser processing results, then the processing accuracy can be improved, but the system only learns final results rather than the degree of processing during irradiation
Solution Approach 1:
The patent applies preliminary action by capturing and analyzing processing state information during laser irradiation, not just after completion. The system acquires datasets that include processing degree information at various stages of irradiation, allowing the machine learning model to learn how processing evolves over time. This enables prediction of intermediate processing states and better control of the irradiation process itself.
Solution Approach 2:
The patent implements feedback mechanisms where the learning unit continuously refines its understanding of processing degree based on acquired data. By feeding back processing intermediate results and adjusting the model accordingly, the system learns to predict not only final outcomes but also the progression of ablation during irradiation. This feedback loop preserves information about processing degree at different stages, enabling more informed control decisions.
Applied Scientific Principles
This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.
Function Achieved in This Case
The method improves the accuracy of laser processing by learning the degree of processing and determining optimal parameters, leading to precise control and simulation of laser beam interactions with the processing object.
Implementation Method 1
a laser processing system that performs ablation processing by irradiating a processing object 10 with laser beam
Data Source
AI summary
Deep learning is performed by using a material of a processing object, a laser beam parameter showing a property of laser beam which the processing object is irradiated with, and pre-processed part data and post-processed part data that respectively reflect laser processing-involved three-dimensional shapes of a processed part before and after irradiation of the processing object with the laser beam. A first relationship of input data that are the material of the processing object, the pre-processed part data, and the laser beam parameter to output data that is the post-processed part data after irradiation with the laser beam in relation to the input data is accordingly obtained as one learning result.


