Variable Laser Beam Shaping for Material Thickness Changes

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

High-power laser systems face inefficiencies in materials processing due to varying responses of materials to beam polarization and thickness, requiring complex and costly adjustments in beam shape and quality, and often necessitate relative motion between the laser and workpiece, which can be expensive and time-consuming.

Innovation Solution

The development of laser systems with shapeable output beams that can alter polarization and beam characteristics, such as BPP and shape, in real-time to match changing material thickness and orientation, using optical elements like Babinet-Soleil compensators and axicon lenses, allowing for dynamic changes in beam profile without the need for complex robotics.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If conventional laser systems use fixed beam shapes and polarizations, then the system structure is simple, but the processing efficiency varies with material thickness and orientation

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing efficiencyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic beam shaping capabilities that allow the laser system to adapt its beam profile (e.g., from Gaussian to annular) in real-time based on material thickness and orientation. This dynamic adaptation enables optimal processing efficiency across varying conditions without requiring multiple fixed systems, resolving the contradiction between productivity and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes key beam parameters (shape, polarization, BPP) dynamically to match processing requirements. By varying these parameters based on material properties, the system maintains high processing efficiency across different thicknesses and orientations while using a single versatile platform rather than multiple specialized systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Area of stationary object

If laser systems require relative motion between beam and workpiece, then processing coverage is improved, but equipment cost and complexity increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing coverageVSAvoidrobotics complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Area of stationary objectVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent employs dynamic beam shaping and scanning capabilities that allow a stationary laser system to process large areas effectively. By rapidly modulating the beam profile and using precise optical scanning, the system achieves comprehensive area coverage without requiring complex robotic positioning systems or movable gantries.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces mechanical motion (robotics, gantries) with optical methods (beam scanning, dynamic shaping). This substitution maintains processing coverage while eliminating the need for expensive and complex mechanical positioning equipment, directly addressing the contradiction between area coverage and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Adaptability or versatility

If multiple laser systems are used to process different materials, then processing versatility is improved, but system cost increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerials processing capabilityVSAvoidnumber of laser systems
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal laser processing system capable of handling diverse materials and thicknesses through dynamic beam shaping. A single system with adaptive capabilities replaces multiple specialized laser systems, achieving processing versatility while reducing overall system cost and complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses real-time beam parameter adjustment to adapt to different material types, thicknesses, and processing requirements. This dynamic versatility allows one system to perform the functions of multiple fixed systems, resolving the contradiction between adaptability and device complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

4Manufacturing precision

If beam shape is optimized for specific material thickness, then processing precision is improved, but adaptability to varying thickness decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecut qualityVSAvoidthickness range capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic beam shaping that automatically adjusts the beam profile to match the current material thickness being processed. This enables the system to maintain optimal cut quality across a wide range of thicknesses without requiring manual reconfiguration or multiple specialized beams, resolving the contradiction between manufacturing precision and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes beam parameters (shape, size, distribution) based on the detected material thickness. This parameter adaptation ensures optimal processing precision for each thickness while maintaining versatility across the full thickness range, directly addressing the contradiction between precision and adaptability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances processing efficiency by optimizing beam performance for different materials and thicknesses, reducing costs and time by allowing for continuous processing without relative motion between the laser and workpiece, while maintaining optimal beam quality and shape throughout the process.

Implementation Method 1

utilizing a Babinet-Soleil compensator, which enables continuously variable polarization of any degree of eccentricity

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectBirefringence: Birefringence

Implementation Method 2

techniques for altering and optimizing the polarization and/or other characteristics (e.g., BPP and/or beam shape) that characterize different materials and material thicknesses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectRefraction: Refraction

Data Source

PatentUS11780029B2Material processing utilizing a laser having a variable beam shape
Publication Date: 2023.10.10 WBC PHOTONICS INC
  • US11780029B2 patent drawing
  • US11780029B2 patent drawing
  • US11780029B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In various embodiments, workpieces are processed, e.g., via welding or cutting, while the shape and/or one or more other parameters of the laser processing beam are altered. The shape and/or one or more other parameters of the laser processing beam may be varied based on one or more characteristics of the workpiece.