Laser-Etched 2D Codes With Shorter Marking Paths

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current laser etching methods for creating machine-readable codes on plastic bottles are time-consuming due to the extensive distance a laser must travel to mark multiple locations, especially when producing thousands of identical bottles with unique identifiers.

Innovation Solution

The use of sub-optimal 2D codes that reduce the distance a laser must travel by selecting inferior mark locations, clustering marks, and employing two lasers to etch different regions simultaneously, along with optimizing mark paths using algorithms like the Lin-Kernighan algorithm and swath-based mark selection.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If an ideal 2D code pattern is used to ensure high fidelity and accuracy, then the code reliability is improved, but the laser travel distance increases significantly, reducing marking speed

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecode reliabilityVSAvoidmarking time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies partial action by selecting only a subset of mark locations that are most critical for code recognition, rather than marking all ideal locations. The system determines minimum necessary mark density and strategic positioning to maintain readability while reducing total mark count, thereby decreasing laser travel distance and marking time while preserving code reliability

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent extracts and removes non-essential marks from the ideal code pattern. By analyzing which marks are critical for code decoding and which can be omitted, the system creates a simplified mark set that maintains functionality with reduced laser travel requirements

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Productivity

If mark locations are selected to minimize laser travel distance, then marking speed is improved, but the code pattern fidelity deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemarking speedVSAvoidcode pattern fidelity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies local quality by varying mark selection criteria based on local code structure requirements. Different regions of the code receive different treatment - critical areas maintain high fidelity with precisely placed marks, while less critical areas use simplified mark patterns, optimizing the balance between overall code reliability and marking efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes parameters such as mark size, mark density, and inter-mark spacing to optimize the balance between code fidelity and marking speed. By adjusting these parameters based on code requirements and laser capabilities, the system achieves acceptable code quality with reduced laser travel distance

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Device complexity

If a single laser is used to etch the entire code, then device complexity is reduced, but the marking time increases due to sequential processing

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelaser system complexityVSAvoidmarking time
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the code marking task into multiple independent regions that can be processed simultaneously. By dividing the code into zones with different mark density requirements, the system can use multiple lasers to work in parallel on different segments, dramatically reducing total marking time while keeping each laser's control relatively simple

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent merges multiple laser systems to work simultaneously on different portions of the same code. By coordinating multiple lasers under a unified control system, the system achieves parallel processing capability that reduces marking time while distributing the complexity across multiple independent laser units

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach significantly speeds up the laser etching process by reducing the path length and increasing efficiency, allowing for faster marking of large numbers of bottles while maintaining the functionality of the machine-readable codes.

Implementation Method 1

Laser etching can be used to mark a bottle with such an identifier. This typically involves a 9.3 μm carbon dioxide laser whose beam is steered by a pair of mirrors

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser ablation: Laser Ablation

Data Source

PatentUS11710020B2Laser marking of machine-readable codes
Publication Date: 2023.07.25 DIGIMARC CORP
  • US11710020B2 patent drawing
  • US11710020B2 patent drawing
  • US11710020B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A surface is laser-etched to convey a 2D machine-readable code pattern. Various strategies are detailed to minimize the etching time. Some strategies include modifying the code pattern to reduce a path length traveled by the laser. Some strategies include modifying the code pattern to make it sub-optimal, i.e., making the code pattern a less-faithful approximation of an ideal code pattern. In some embodiments the etched surface is the surface of a plastic container, and the code pattern conveys information indicating the type of plastic of which the container is manufactured. A variety of other features and arrangements are also detailed.