Laser Contour Machining with Impact Angle Threshold Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for creating contour surfaces on workpieces using laser machining lack precision and efficiency, particularly in achieving high accuracy and maintaining desired geometries during material removal.

Innovation Solution

A method utilizing a laser processing machine with adjustable impact angles for laser beam impulses, ensuring the impact angle is between a minimum and threshold angle to control effective laser energy density, preventing unwanted material removal and maintaining the desired geometry of the contour surface.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the impact angle of laser beam impulses is increased to improve material removal efficiency, then productivity increases, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to unwanted material removal and geometry deviations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal efficiencyVSAvoidcontour surface accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by dynamically adjusting the impact angle of laser beam impulses as a critical process parameter. The impact angle is varied within a specific range (0° to 45° relative to the surface normal) depending on the local geometry of the contour surface being created. This parameter optimization enables the system to achieve both high material removal rates and precise contour accuracy by selecting the optimal impact angle for each machining location.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Productivity

If the impact angle is set to a large value to enhance material removal rate, then productivity improves, but manufacturing precision worsens due to effective laser energy density exceeding threshold fluence and causing unwanted material removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal rateVSAvoidcontour surface geometry accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements feedback control by continuously monitoring the impact angle and adjusting it based on the local surface geometry and desired contour. The system calculates the optimal impact angle for each position along the contour path and adjusts the laser beam orientation accordingly. This closed-loop control ensures that the effective laser energy density remains below the threshold fluence for creating new contour surfaces while maintaining high material removal efficiency in volume removal operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

3Manufacturing precision

If the impact angle is reduced to improve manufacturing precision and prevent unwanted material removal, then manufacturing precision improves, but productivity decreases due to slower material removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontour surface accuracyVSAvoidmaterial removal efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies dynamics by making the impact angle a dynamic variable rather than a fixed parameter. The impact angle changes continuously during the machining process based on the local geometry of the workpiece and the specific operation being performed (volume removal vs. contour creation). This dynamic adjustment allows the system to optimize both productivity and precision at different stages and locations of the machining process, rather than being constrained by a single fixed impact angle setting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach allows for precise creation of contour surfaces with high accuracy and efficiency by ensuring only necessary material is removed, maintaining the intended geometry and preventing deviations.

Implementation Method 1

A method for material removal laser machining of a workpiece under use of a laser processing machine having a laser creating laser beam impulses

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser ablation: Laser Ablation

Data Source

PatentUS12179287B2Method for the material-removing laser machining of a workpiece
Publication Date: 2024.12.31 WALTER MASCHINENBAU GMBH
  • US12179287B2 patent drawing
  • US12179287B2 patent drawing
  • US12179287B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for the material-removing machining of a workpiece by laser beam pulses. The laser beam pulses are directed to impact points on the surface of a volume to be removed of the workpiece in order to cut away material from the volume to be removed. Cutting away the volume to be removed results in a new contour surface to be produced on the workpiece. An impact angle of the laser beam pulses relative to the contour surface to be produced is set in accordance with a predefined condition during the removal of at least part of the volume to be removed that directly adjoins the contour surface to be produced. According to this condition, the impact angle is the same as a threshold angle (as), or somewhat smaller.