Laser Cutting Parameter Recommendation Using Cut Edge Feature Analysis

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional laser cutting methods rely on subjective interpretations of cut edge characteristics, leading to process and quality fluctuations, and existing objective measurement methods have not improved the process flow effectively.

Innovation Solution

A method and device that read out machine and material parameters, and desired cut edge quality features, to output process parameter recommendations created by a process parameter algorithm with data aggregation routines based on multiple cut edge quality features, thereby improving cut edge quality.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If subjective interpretation methods are used to determine process parameters, then ease of operation is maintained, but manufacturing precision and reliability deteriorate due to process and quality fluctuations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecut edge qualityVSAvoidoperation complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-diagnosis and self-optimization by automatically analyzing cut edge quality features and adjusting process parameters without requiring expert intervention. The evaluation algorithm independently determines optimal parameters based on measured cut edge characteristics, enabling the system to serve itself rather than relying on external expert judgment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces the mechanical/cognitive system of expert interpretation with an automated optical measurement and computational evaluation system. Instead of relying on human experts to visually assess cut edges and adjust parameters, the system uses objective measurement devices and algorithms to automatically determine process parameters, substituting human judgment with automated technical systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If objective measurement methods are introduced to improve manufacturing precision, then cut edge quality improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecut edge qualityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The evaluation algorithm serves multiple functions: it evaluates cut edge quality, determines process parameters, and adapts to different material and machine configurations. The system integrates measurement, analysis, and control functions into a single multi-functional platform, reducing the need for separate specialized devices for each function.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts process parameters based on measured cut edge quality features and material characteristics. By changing parameters such as laser power, feed rate, and focus position based on real-time evaluation, the system achieves high precision without requiring complex hardware modifications, instead relying on flexible parameter optimization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Measurement precision

If expert knowledge is required to interpret cut edge features, then measurement precision can be maintained, but productivity decreases due to manual intervention requirements

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecut edge evaluation accuracyVSAvoidprocess efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements closed-loop feedback by continuously measuring cut edge quality features and using this information to adjust process parameters for subsequent cuts. The evaluation results feed back into the control system, creating a self-correcting process that maintains measurement precision while eliminating the need for manual expert intervention between measurements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The automated evaluation algorithm independently performs the interpretation of cut edge features that previously required expert knowledge. The system self-diagnoses quality issues and self-adjusts parameters without external assistance, converting the manual expert process into an automated self-service system that maintains accuracy while improving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The method enables improved cut edge quality and simplifies the process for users, even those not skilled in the art, by providing objective and optimized process parameter recommendations.

Implementation Method 1

The energy introduced by the laser results, depending on the method, in melting, burning, or sublimation of the workpiece material in the kerf

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Implementation Method 2

The energy introduced by the laser results, depending on the method, in melting, burning, or sublimation of the workpiece material in the kerf

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 3

The energy introduced by the laser results, depending on the method, in melting, burning, or sublimation of the workpiece material in the kerf

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectSublimation: Sublimation

Data Source

PatentUS12275086B2Method and device for processing a workpiece
Publication Date: 2025.04.15 TRUMPF WERKZEUGMASCHINEN GMBH & CO KG
  • US12275086B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for processing a workpiece with a laser cutting machine includes reading out a machine parameter and a material parameter and outputting a process parameter recommendation. The process parameter recommendation is created by a process parameter algorithm with at least one data aggregation routine based on a plurality of cut edge quality features. The method further includes generating a cut edge by laser processing the workpiece.