Laser Cutting Intersecting Apertures for Edge Quality

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional workpiece processing machines require multiple perpendicular grid-like inner cuts to form shapes, which is inefficient and results in lower quality edges due to larger residual workpiece segments that can affect processing quality.

Innovation Solution

The method involves forming intersecting apertures in a workpiece using a laser beam along intersecting line paths and cutting out a shape by moving the laser beam along a continuous final path extending around the intersection point, reducing the number of inner cuts and gradually removing residual segments in a spiral manner to achieve faster and higher quality cutting.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If multiple perpendicular grid-like inner cuts are used to form shapes, then the cutting operation can be completed, but the processing time increases and edge quality deteriorates due to larger residual workpiece segments

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecutting speedVSAvoidedge quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The cutting path is segmented into two distinct phases: (1) forming intersecting apertures that create smaller residual segments, and (2) a continuous spiral path that gradually removes these segments. This segmentation allows the process to first create favorable conditions for quality (small segments) and then efficiently remove material (continuous motion).

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The intersecting aperture lines are formed as preliminary cuts before the final continuous cutting path. These preliminary cuts create a pattern that divides the workpiece into smaller segments that will be removed by the subsequent spiral path, preparing the workpiece structure to achieve better edge quality during the main cutting operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

2Manufacturing precision

If multiple perpendicular grid-like inner cuts are formed, then the shape can be defined, but the number of cuts increases reducing processing efficiency

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveshape definitionVSAvoidnumber of cuts
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Instead of defining the shape through multiple perpendicular cuts that create a grid pattern, the invention inverts the approach by using intersecting aperture lines that meet at a central point, creating radial segments. This inverted geometry reduces the number of required cuts while maintaining shape definition accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

Solution Approach 2:

The final cutting path uses a spiral (curved) trajectory instead of straight perpendicular lines. This curved continuous path efficiently defines the shape boundary while reducing the total number of cuts compared to a grid-like perpendicular pattern, combining shape precision with cutting efficiency.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #14Spheroidality (Curvature)

3Productivity

If larger residual workpiece segments remain after inner cuts, then fewer cuts are needed, but the processing quality decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvenumber of operationsVSAvoidprocessing quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The invention changes the parameter of residual segment size by using intersecting aperture lines that create smaller segments compared to conventional perpendicular grid cuts. This parameter change (smaller segments) directly improves processing quality while the continuous spiral removal path maintains efficiency by avoiding multiple separate cutting operations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables faster and more efficient cutting with higher quality edges by forming fewer inner cuts, reducing residual workpiece fragments to a size that falls between supporting elements, thus improving processing quality and efficiency.

Implementation Method 1

forming intersecting apertures in a workpiece with a laser beam by moving the laser beam along intersecting line paths

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser beam heating: Laser

Implementation Method 2

cutting out a portion of a shape from the workpiece by moving the laser beam along a continuous final path extending around an intersection point of the intersecting line paths

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser beam cutting: Laser

Data Source

PatentUS8716625B2Workpiece cutting
Publication Date: 2014.05.06 TRUMPF WERKZEUGMASCHINEN GMBH & CO KG
  • US8716625B2 patent drawing
  • US8716625B2 patent drawing
  • US8716625B2 patent drawing

AI summary

In some aspects, methods includes forming intersecting apertures in a workpiece with a laser beam by moving the laser beam along intersecting line paths, and cutting out a portion of a shape from the workpiece by moving the laser beam along a continuous final path extending around an intersection point of the intersecting line paths.