Laser Diode Submount CTE Mismatch Stress Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing high power semiconductor laser diode devices face challenges with heat dissipation and mechanical stress due to mismatched thermal expansion coefficients between laser diodes and coolers, leading to reliability issues and suboptimal optical performance.

Innovation Solution

A submount/cooler assembly with a controlled coefficient of thermal expansion (CTEeff) that intentionally applies stress to the laser bar, differing from the CTEbar by a predetermined amount, allowing for optimized mechanical properties and improved reliability and spectral purity.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Stress or pressure

If a CTE-matched submount is used to reduce thermal expansion mismatch, then mechanical stress is reduced, but solder interface stability deteriorates under thermal cycling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemechanical stressVSAvoidsolder interface stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Stress or pressureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces a stress relief layer as an intermediary between the laser bar and submount. This layer acts as a mediator that decouples the thermal expansion mismatch from the solder interface, allowing the submount to be CTE-matched for stress reduction while the stress relief layer protects the solder joint from thermal cycling damage.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent segments the mounting structure into distinct functional layers: laser bar, stress relief layer, submount, and cooler. This segmentation allows each layer to be optimized independently - the submount for CTE matching and stress reduction, the stress relief layer for protecting the solder interface, and the cooler for heat dissipation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

2Ease of manufacture

If soft solder is used for mounting, then ease of assembly is improved, but operational reliability deteriorates at high power levels

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveease of assemblyVSAvoidoperational reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The stress relief layer is positioned beforehand between the laser bar and submount to cushion and absorb thermal expansion stresses before they reach the solder interface. This pre-positioned protective layer enables the use of soft solder for easy assembly while preventing its known weakness under thermal cycling.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #11Beforehand cushioning (Prior cushioning)

3Reliability

If hard solder is used for mounting, then operational reliability is improved, but mechanical stress increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveoperational reliabilityVSAvoidmechanical stress
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The stress relief layer serves as a compliant intermediary that allows hard solder to be used for reliable high-power operation while preventing excessive mechanical stress from being transmitted to the laser bar. The stress relief layer absorbs the stress that would otherwise be imposed by the rigid hard solder joint.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Temperature

If direct mounting to copper cooler is used, then heat dissipation is improved, but thermal expansion mismatch increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveheat dissipationVSAvoidthermal expansion mismatch
Core Design Contradiction:
TemperatureVSStress or pressure

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the thermal path into multiple layers with different CTEs: laser bar, stress relief layer, CTE-matched submount, and copper cooler. This segmentation allows the copper cooler to provide excellent heat dissipation while the intermediate layers progressively accommodate the thermal expansion mismatch.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the CTE parameter of the submount to match the laser bar, creating a gradual transition in thermal expansion properties from the laser bar through the submount to the copper cooler. This parameter matching reduces thermal stress while maintaining effective heat dissipation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the reliability and optical performance of high power laser diodes by controlling stress, achieving higher rated output power with reduced smile values and improved beam shaping, while maintaining stability and polarization purity.

Implementation Method 1

the large mismatch in thermal expansion coefficient (CTE) between the commonly used laser diodes and the cooler

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal expansion: Thermal Expansion

Implementation Method 2

The laser bar is directly attached to the copper cooler using a 'soft solder', e.g. In, InAg, or InSn

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectThermal conduction: Conduction (thermal)

Data Source

PatentUS8565276B2High power semiconductor laser diodes
Publication Date: 2013.10.22 II VI DELAWARE INC
  • US8565276B2 patent drawing
  • US8565276B2 patent drawing
  • US8565276B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A high power laser source comprises a bar of laser diodes having a first coefficient of thermal expansion CTEbar on a submount having a second coefficient CTEsub and a cooler having a third coefficient CTEcool. The submount/cooler assembly shows an effective fourth coefficient CTEeff differing from CTEbar. This difference leads to a deformation of the crystal lattice of the lasers' active regions by mechanical stress. CTEeff is selected to be either lower than both CTEbar and CTEcool or is selected to be between CTEbar and CTEcool. The submount may either comprise layers of materials having different CTEs, e.g., a Cu layer of 10-40 μm thickness and a Mo layer of 100-400 μm thickness, or a single material with a varying CTEsub. Both result in a CTEsub varying across the submount's thickness.