Laser Beam and Gas Jet Axis Alignment Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

In laser machining processes, maintaining the optimal relative positioning between the laser beam axis and the gas jet axis is challenging due to factors like contamination of the laser nozzle, leading to suboptimal machining results.

Innovation Solution

A method involving a laser beam position indicator and a gas jet position indicator, which are moved relative to axial position detection elements to determine and adjust their alignment, utilizing existing movement control systems of the laser machine tool, allowing for precise and user-friendly determination of the relative positions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If the laser beam axis and gas jet axis are manually aligned using conventional methods (camera detection or tape shot method), then the initial positioning can be achieved, but the alignment precision deteriorates over time due to nozzle contamination and operational variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment precisionVSAvoidalignment stability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-alignment by automatically detecting the relative positions of the laser beam axis and gas jet axis using position detection elements, eliminating the need for manual intervention and maintaining consistent alignment precision over time

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system continuously monitors the relative positions of the laser beam and gas jet axes using position detection elements and provides feedback to the control unit, which automatically adjusts the positioning to maintain optimal alignment despite operational variations or contamination

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If additional specialized equipment is added to maintain alignment precision, then measurement accuracy improves, but device complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment detection accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The position detection elements serve multiple functions: they detect the relative positions of both the laser beam axis and gas jet axis, and their signals are used for both alignment determination and automatic positioning control, eliminating the need for separate specialized alignment equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The system combines the alignment detection function with the existing position detection elements already present in the laser machining system, merging multiple functions into existing components rather than adding separate specialized equipment

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

3Measurement precision

If frequent manual realignment is performed to maintain optimal positioning, then alignment accuracy is preserved, but productivity decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvealignment accuracyVSAvoidmachining productivity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system continuously monitors and maintains the relative positions of the laser beam and gas jet axes throughout operation using automatic detection and adjustment, eliminating the need to stop machining for realignment and maintaining continuous productive operation

Inventive Principle:
Principle #20Continuity of useful action

Solution Approach 2:

The system automatically detects and corrects alignment deviations without requiring manual intervention, maintaining optimal alignment accuracy throughout the machining process without interrupting productivity

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables high-precision and efficient adjustment of the relative positions of the laser beam and gas jet axes, ensuring optimal machining conditions and minimizing the need for additional equipment or complex setup procedures.

Implementation Method 1

In different types of laser machining of workpieces, in addition to a laser machining beam a process gas jet is directed onto the machining point

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser ablation: Laser Ablation

Implementation Method 2

During infeed of oxygen as the process gas, the cutting process is additionally assisted by oxidation processes at the machining point

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOxidation: Oxidation

Implementation Method 3

causing relative motion between the position indicators and a position detection element, such that the position indicators traverse at least a leading edge of the position detection element, while detecting when each of the two position indicators engages the position detection element

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectOptical detection: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS7528344B2Determining the relative positions of the axes of a laser machining beam and a process gas jet
Publication Date: 2009.05.05 TRUMPF WERKZEUGMASCHINEN GMBH & CO KG
  • US7528344B2 patent drawing
  • US7528344B2 patent drawing
  • US7528344B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Determination of the relative positioning of a laser machining beam and a process gas jet on a laser machine tool are accomplished by motion of detections made while moving the machining beam and gas jet in relation to a detection element. In some cases actions of the beam and gas jet themselves are detected, such as by cutting light response and sensor deflection caused by the gas jet. Relative head positions at the time of the deflections are used to calculate misalignment between the laser beam and gas jet.