Machine Learning Apparatus for Laser Machining Condition Optimization

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional laser machining technologies face challenges in determining optimal machining conditions due to the complex interplay of numerous parameters and state amounts within the laser machining system, leading to suboptimal results and increased time and effort in achieving high-quality, accurate cuts with issues like bead-like deposits and lack of quantitative evaluation.

Innovation Solution

A machine learning apparatus that observes state amounts of the laser machining system and learns laser machining condition data in association with machined results, adjusting parameters such as optical output, beam mode, and assist gas to optimize machining conditions automatically and prevent damage from excessive reflected light.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If conventional laser machining technologies are used to determine optimal machining conditions, then machining can be performed with basic parameters, but the results are suboptimal with bead-like deposits and lack of machining accuracy

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the machine learning apparatus continuously learns from machining results and state amounts, adjusting laser machining conditions in real-time. The apparatus receives machining result data and system state data, processes this information through learning, and outputs optimized machining conditions that are fed back to the laser machining system, creating a closed-loop control system that progressively improves machining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The machine learning apparatus enables the laser machining system to automatically determine optimal machining conditions without extensive human intervention. The system self-learns from accumulated data, automatically adjusts parameters such as laser power, scanning speed, and focal position, and adapts to changing system states, making the complex optimization process autonomous and reducing the need for manual parameter tuning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

2Manufacturing precision

If numerous parameters and state amounts are considered to optimize machining conditions, then machining quality improves, but the time and effort required to achieve optimal results increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining qualityVSAvoidtime to achieve optimal results
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning apparatus performs preliminary learning and analysis of the complex interrelationships between numerous parameters and state amounts before actual machining begins. By pre-processing data and establishing optimal condition mappings in advance, the system reduces the time required during actual machining operations, as the learning framework is already in place to quickly determine optimal parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces manual trial-and-error parameter adjustment with an automated machine learning system. Instead of mechanically testing numerous parameter combinations through human operators, the system uses computational algorithms to analyze data patterns and predict optimal machining conditions, dramatically reducing the time and effort required to achieve high-quality results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

3Productivity

If laser machining is performed at high speeds to increase productivity, then output improves, but machining accuracy and quality deteriorate

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining speedVSAvoidmachining quality
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning apparatus dynamically adjusts laser machining parameters in real-time based on current system states and learned relationships. Rather than using fixed parameters, the system continuously adapts scanning speed, laser power, and other parameters to maintain optimal machining quality even at high speeds. This dynamic adjustment allows the system to exploit the full productivity potential while preserving machining accuracy.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs parameter changes as a core mechanism, where the machine learning system identifies and implements optimal parameter combinations for high-speed machining. By learning from data how parameters interact and affect both speed and quality, the system can modify parameters such as pulse duration, peak power, and scanning velocity to achieve high productivity without sacrificing machining quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Reliability

If reflected light is not monitored and controlled, then the system operates simply, but damage may occur to the laser apparatus from excessive reflected light

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem safetyVSAvoidmonitoring system complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The machine learning apparatus incorporates reflected light monitoring as part of its feedback loop. Sensors detect reflected light levels, and this information is fed into the learning system, which analyzes the data and adjusts machining parameters to prevent excessive reflected light conditions. The system learns from reflected light patterns and proactively modifies parameters before damage can occur, integrating safety monitoring seamlessly into the control framework.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The system applies preliminary anti-action by using the machine learning apparatus to predict and prevent reflected light damage before it occurs. By analyzing current machining conditions and learned patterns, the system identifies situations where reflected light may become excessive and takes preventive action by adjusting parameters in advance, such as modifying beam focus or scanning speed, thereby preventing damage rather than merely responding to it.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #9Preliminary anti-action

Data Source

PatentUS10664767B2Machine learning apparatus, laser machining system and machine learning method
Publication Date: 2020.05.26 FANUC LTD
  • US10664767B2 patent drawing
  • US10664767B2 patent drawing
  • US10664767B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A machine learning apparatus that learns laser machining condition data of a laser machining system includes: a state amount observation unit that observes a state amount of the laser machining system; an operation result acquisition unit that acquires a machined result of the laser machining system; a learning unit that receives an output from the state amount observation unit and an output from the operation result acquisition unit, and learns the laser machining condition data in association with the state amount and the machined result of the laser machining system; and a decision-making unit that outputs laser machining condition data by referring to the laser machining condition data learned by the learning unit.