Laser Machining Feedback Control for Precision and Reliability

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional laser beam machining systems face limitations in process speed and accuracy due to the small spot diameter of the laser beam, leading to potential re-clogging of melted material and reduced positioning reliability, especially when processing hard and brittle materials like steel.

Innovation Solution

The method involves using a scanner to detect plasma and reflected laser radiation, generating a signal that regulates the position and ablation depth of the laser beam, allowing for correction in subsequent removal cycles to maintain contour accuracy and efficiency, and adjusting parameters like laser power and speed to compensate for positioning inaccuracies.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Manufacturing precision

If the laser beam spot diameter is reduced to trace finer contours, then manufacturing precision is improved, but positioning reliability deteriorates due to re-clogging of melted material

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontour tracing precisionVSAvoidpositioning reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback control system using plasma radiation detectors to monitor the machining process in real-time. The detected plasma radiation signal provides feedback about the actual machining state, allowing the system to detect and correct positioning deviations dynamically, thereby maintaining positioning reliability even with small spot diameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces mechanical positioning systems with optical feedback mechanisms. Instead of relying solely on mechanical positioning accuracy, the system uses plasma radiation detection and optical feedback to achieve and maintain precise positioning, eliminating the re-clogging problem associated with purely mechanical approaches.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If the laser beam intensity is increased to sublimate material without melting, then productivity is improved, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to reduced control over material removal

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvematerial removal speedVSAvoidcontour accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The plasma radiation detection system provides real-time feedback on the material removal process. By monitoring the intensity and characteristics of plasma radiation, the system can detect variations in material removal rate and adjust laser parameters dynamically, maintaining contour accuracy even at high material removal speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent dynamically adjusts laser parameters (intensity, pulse duration, frequency) based on real-time plasma radiation signals. This allows the system to optimize the balance between material removal speed and contour accuracy by changing parameters adaptively during the machining process.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Productivity

If the laser beam is focused to a small spot diameter to achieve high intensity, then productivity is improved through rapid sublimation, but manufacturing precision deteriorates due to positioning inaccuracies

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocessing speedVSAvoidpositioning accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The feedback control system using plasma radiation detectors continuously monitors the actual laser beam position and machining state. This allows real-time detection and correction of positioning inaccuracies, ensuring that the high-intensity focused beam maintains manufacturing precision while achieving high processing speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent introduces plasma radiation detection as an intermediary between the laser beam and the control system. This intermediary provides real-time information about the actual machining state, enabling the control system to compensate for positioning errors and maintain precision at high speeds.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

4Manufacturing precision

If conventional mechanical processing is used to machine hard materials, then manufacturing precision can be achieved, but the tool experiences wear and tear

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemachining accuracyVSAvoidtool life
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent replaces mechanical cutting tools with a laser beam for material removal. The laser beam interacts with the material through thermal processes (melting, vaporization, sublimation) rather than mechanical contact, eliminating tool wear and tear while maintaining machining accuracy on hard materials.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent utilizes phase transitions (melting, vaporization, sublimation) of the workpiece material as the primary material removal mechanism. By controlling the laser beam parameters, the material undergoes controlled phase changes to achieve precise machining without mechanical tool contact, thereby eliminating tool wear.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #36Phase transitions

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures greater process reliability and precision in laser beam machining, enabling efficient processing of complex shapes and high-strength materials with minimal wear, and eliminates the need for mechanical tools by sublimating material without re-melting, thus preventing re-clogging.

Implementation Method 1

a laser beam is applied to the workpiece using a scanner, material of the workpiece is removed

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser ablation: Laser Ablation

Implementation Method 2

the radiation produced by the plasma and/or reflected laser radiation in the work area during the process is detected

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPlasma radiation detection: Plasma

Implementation Method 3

a laser beam is applied to the workpiece using a scanner

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser beam scanning: Laser

Data Source

PatentEP2691206B1Method for machining a workpiece by means of a laser beam
Publication Date: 2019.05.29 THYSSENKRUPP STEEL EUROPE AG PATENTE PATENT DEPARTMENT
  • EP2691206B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP2691206B1 patent drawingFigure 3a~5

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for machining a workpiece (10), in particular a component of a motor vehicle, by means of a laser beam, wherein a laser beam (1) is applied to the workpiece (5) by means of a scanner (5), material of the workpiece is ablated, the radiation created by the plasma (8) during the process in the work area and/or the reflected laser radiation is detected and a signal is generated in accordance with the detected plasma and/or laser radiation. The aim of providing a method by means of which greater process reliability can be assured during laser beam machining is achieved by controlling, by closed-loop or open-loop control, the position of the laser beam in relation to the workpiece and/or the ablation depth in accordance with the signal.