Laser Machining Control With LIBS Feedback for Additive Manufacturing

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing additive manufacturing techniques, such as fused deposition modeling, are limited in fabricating complex structures like curved or irregular surfaces, particularly for antenna designs in aviation or aerospace applications, due to a lack of closed-loop control in laser machining processes, which can lead to inconsistencies and inefficiencies in material processing.

Innovation Solution

Implementing laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) for real-time monitoring and control of laser ablation during additive manufacturing, allowing for the precise adjustment of ablative optical energy based on the spectrum of the ablative plume generated, enabling the fabrication of structures with tailored properties on non-planar surfaces.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If open-loop laser machining is used in additive manufacturing, then the process is simple and fast, but manufacturing precision and consistency deteriorate due to lack of feedback control

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvelaser machining speedVSAvoidmaterial processing consistency
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements closed-loop feedback control by monitoring the ablative plume spectrum in real-time during laser machining. The LIBS system detects material composition and processing state, feeding this information back to adjust laser parameters dynamically, thereby maintaining manufacturing precision while preserving high productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional mechanical measurement and control systems with optical-based LIBS spectroscopy. By using spectral analysis of the ablative plume instead of physical probes or post-processing measurements, the system achieves real-time feedback control that maintains both speed and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Device complexity

If laser machining is performed without closed-loop monitoring, then the equipment complexity is low, but manufacturing precision and reliability worsen due to inability to account for material variations

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment simplicityVSAvoiddimensional accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The system incorporates real-time spectral feedback from LIBS monitoring to detect material composition variations and adjust laser parameters accordingly. This feedback loop compensates for material property changes and geometric variations, maintaining dimensional accuracy without requiring overly complex pre-calibration systems.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The laser machining system performs self-correction by using its own ablative plume as the sensing medium. The LIBS monitoring detects processing quality in real-time, and the system automatically adjusts parameters without external intervention, simplifying the overall control architecture while improving precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Manufacturing precision

If real-time spectral monitoring is implemented, then manufacturing precision and reliability improve, but device complexity and energy consumption increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess control accuracyVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the processing and monitoring functions into a single integrated system. The laser that performs machining also generates the ablative plume that serves as the sensing medium for LIBS. This combination eliminates the need for separate sensing systems and reduces overall device complexity while maintaining high manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The laser system performs multiple functions: material ablation, plume generation, and spectral source for LIBS analysis. This multi-functionality reduces the need for additional dedicated components, thereby limiting the increase in device complexity while achieving real-time precision control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Ease of manufacture

If conventional additive manufacturing is used for curved surfaces, then the process is simple, but the ability to fabricate complex geometries deteriorates

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveprocess simplicityVSAvoidcomplex geometry fabrication capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic laser parameter adjustment based on real-time LIBS feedback, enabling the system to adapt to varying surface geometries and material properties during processing. This dynamic control allows fabrication of complex curved surfaces while maintaining process simplicity through automated adaptation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes laser processing parameters (power, pulse duration, scan speed) based on real-time spectral feedback from LIBS monitoring. This parameter adaptation enables precise fabrication of complex geometries on curved surfaces without requiring complex mechanical reconfiguration, maintaining ease of manufacture while enhancing versatility.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enhances the consistency, efficiency, and reliability of laser machining in additive manufacturing, enabling the creation of high-performance, complex geometries suitable for aerospace applications by providing closed-loop feedback and precise control over material processing.

Implementation Method 1

laser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS) for real-time monitoring and control of laser ablation during additive manufacturing, allowing for the precise adjustment of ablative optical energy based on the spectrum of the ablative plume generated

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser-induced breakdown spectroscopy (LIBS): Laser Ablation

Data Source

PatentUS20230127791A1Laser machining and related control for additive manufacturing
Publication Date: 2023.04.27 EMBRY RIDDLE AERONAUTICAL UNIV
  • US20230127791A1 patent drawing
  • US20230127791A1 patent drawing
  • US20230127791A1 patent drawing

AI summary

Additive manufacturing can include use of a laser-machining technique. Laser machining can be used to form cavities, trenches, or other features in an additively-manufactured structure. Spectroscopy can be performed to monitor a laser machining operation. For example, a laser-enhanced additive manufacturing process flow can include depositing a conductive layer on a surface of a dielectric layer, and conductively isolating a first region from a second region of the conductive layer using ablative optical energy, including applying ablative optical energy to the conductive layer, monitoring a spectrum of an ablative plume generated by applying the ablative optical energy, and controlling the ablative optical energy in response to a characteristic of the spectrum of the ablative plume.