Laser Machining Parameter Learning for Wide-Range Precision Setup

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current methods for determining laser machining parameters are imprecise and limited to local data ranges, requiring extensive and costly testing, and do not allow for optimal parameter determination across a wide variety of laser machining systems.

Innovation Solution

A method using a machine learning approach with a central unit and learning database to determine optimal laser machining parameters, including polarization, pulse energy, beam diameter, Gaussian order, pulse repetition rate, and wavelength, based on previous machining data samples, enabling accurate and efficient machining across different materials and systems.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If linear response models are used to model laser-material interaction, then the model is simple to implement, but the reliable response range is limited and cannot cover adequate ranges for full device capacity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemodel complexityVSAvoidparameter range coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent transforms the approach from using simple linear models with limited parameter ranges to using machine learning models that can handle wide parameter ranges. The machine learning model learns complex non-linear relationships between laser parameters and machining results, enabling the system to determine optimal parameters across a broad spectrum of operating conditions without requiring complex physical models for each scenario.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent replaces traditional physics-based linear modeling approaches with data-driven machine learning algorithms. Instead of relying on simplified physical models that require extensive manual calibration and experimentation, the system uses supervised learning algorithms trained on experimental data to directly predict optimal machining parameters, eliminating the need for complex model development and parameter tuning.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Productivity

If extrapolation of experimental machining results is used to determine laser machining parameters, then the method requires minimal testing, but the results are imprecise and assessment is left to user judgment

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveparameter determination speedVSAvoidparameter determination accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements a feedback mechanism where the machine learning model is trained on experimental machining results and uses this learned knowledge to predict optimal parameters for new machining scenarios. The model continuously improves by learning from the relationship between input parameters and actual machining outcomes, providing objectively assessed predictions rather than relying on user judgment of extrapolated results.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Solution Approach 2:

The patent performs preliminary machine learning training on a comprehensive dataset of experimental machining results before actual machining operations. This pre-learning phase enables the system to quickly determine optimal parameters for new materials or machining conditions without requiring extensive real-time experimentation, thus achieving both speed and precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

3Device complexity

If local extrapolation around experimental machining results is used, then the method is simple to implement, but it cannot determine parameters over a wide data range

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemethod complexityVSAvoiddata range coverage
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSAdaptability or versatility

Solution Approach 1:

The patent creates a universal machine learning model that can determine optimal laser machining parameters across a wide variety of materials, machining conditions, and device configurations. The model is trained on diverse experimental data and can generalize to new scenarios, making it applicable to different laser machining systems and materials without requiring system-specific recalibration or separate models for each case.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Data Source

PatentUS12032878B2Method for determining laser machining parameters and laser machining device using this method
Publication Date: 2024.07.09 LASER ENG APPL
  • US12032878B2 patent drawing
  • US12032878B2 patent drawing
  • US12032878B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Method for determining laser machining parameters for the machining of a material using a laser machining system comprises the following steps: a) providing said central unit with a learning machining function capable of learning on the basis of said plurality of machining data samples, said learning machining function comprising an algorithm capable of defining the following laser machining parameters for said machining result sought and for said machining system: a polarization, an pulse energy Ep, a diameter at the focal point w, a Gaussian order p, a pulse repetition rate PRR of pulses n, a wavelength; b) making said learning machining function to learn so as to said laser machining system can machine said material to be machined according to the machining result sought.