Laser Return Pulse Discrimination for Long-Range Pixel Detectors

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional laser ranging systems face challenges in detecting poorly reflective objects at long distances, requiring high laser pulse energy and sensitive photoreceivers to accommodate large dynamic ranges, while also ensuring safety and reducing ocular damage.

Innovation Solution

A photonic integrated circuit (ROIC) with safety features, such as ASIL compliance, is developed to validate the signal path by generating photons directly and applying electrical stimulation, allowing for pulse validation and alert generation based on response analysis, thereby enhancing detection accuracy and safety.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Measurement precision

If high laser pulse energy is used to detect poorly reflective objects at long distances, then detection capability is improved, but ocular damage risk increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection capabilityVSAvoidocular damage risk
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs preliminary validation of the returned pulse characteristics (shape, amplitude, timing) before processing the range measurement. By checking these parameters in advance, the system can identify and reject false pulses from spurious sources, allowing safe operation at lower laser energies while maintaining detection accuracy for legitimate targets.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system implements feedback mechanisms where the detected pulse characteristics are continuously monitored and compared against expected patterns. This feedback loop enables the system to adaptively distinguish between genuine target returns and spurious pulses, improving detection reliability without requiring increased laser energy that would raise safety concerns.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Measurement precision

If sensitive photoreceivers are used to accommodate large dynamic ranges, then detection sensitivity is improved, but system complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedetection sensitivityVSAvoidsystem complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than using highly sensitive photoreceivers that would detect all possible signals including noise, the system employs a validation approach that processes only pulses meeting specific criteria. This partial action strategy maintains adequate detection sensitivity for legitimate targets while filtering out spurious signals through pulse characteristic validation, avoiding the need for excessively sensitive (and complex) receiver hardware.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the operational parameters of pulse validation dynamically, adjusting the thresholds and criteria for accepting pulse returns based on operating conditions. This allows the system to maintain optimal detection sensitivity across large dynamic ranges without requiring hardware that can handle every possible signal level, thereby reducing overall system complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If pulse validation and alert generation are implemented, then false pulse rejection is improved, but processing time increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvefalse pulse rejectionVSAvoidprocessing time
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The validation checks for pulse shape, amplitude, and timing characteristics are performed as preliminary steps in the signal processing chain, before full range measurement calculation. By establishing acceptance criteria early in the process, the system can quickly reject invalid pulses without committing to full processing, thereby maintaining high false pulse rejection while minimizing time loss for valid signals.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The solution improves the detection of poorly reflective objects at long distances by validating signal responses and reducing false pulses, ensuring accurate range measurement and safety in automotive applications.

Implementation Method 1

A photodiode converts the optical energy to current

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric effect: Photoelectric Effect

Implementation Method 2

a LED is located proximate the detector pixel to generate a photon in response to an electrical signal

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectElectroluminescence: Electroluminescence

Data Source

PatentUS11791604B2Detector system having type of laser discrimination
Publication Date: 2023.10.17 ALLEGRO MICROSYSTEMS LLC
  • US11791604B2 patent drawing
  • US11791604B2 patent drawing
  • US11791604B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatus for receiving a return laser pulse at a detector system having pixels in a pixel array and analyzing a response of the pixels in the pixel array including comparing the response to at least one threshold corresponding to decay of photonic energy of the laser pulse over distance and target reflectivity, wherein the at least one threshold comprises a first threshold corresponding to a low trigger for a pulse generated by a first type of laser and a second threshold corresponding to a high trigger for the pulse generated by the first type of laser. Embodiments can further include generating an alert signal based on the response of the pixels in the pixel array.