Laser Receiver Beam Comparison for Reflection Discrimination

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for comparing a received beam incident on a laser receiver with a rotating laser beam fail to accurately distinguish between rotating laser beams and reflections on a reflecting surface, leading to incorrect measurements.

Innovation Solution

The method involves orienting the rotating laser and laser receiver components parallel or perpendicular to the gravitational direction, using an evaluation unit to determine the adjustment direction of the received beam relative to the laser receiver, and comparing it with the tripod's height direction to differentiate between rotating laser beams and reflections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If modulation signal is used to identify rotating laser beams, then the risk of incorrect measurements is reduced, but reflected laser beams are incorrectly categorized as rotating laser beams

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement accuracyVSAvoidbeam identification accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The detection field is segmented into multiple photo-detector arrays with different spatial orientations. Each array evaluates the received beam independently, and the combination of evaluation results from multiple arrays enables distinction between direct rotating laser beams and reflected beams based on their different spatial characteristics.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent adds a spatial dimension to beam identification by using multiple photo-detector arrays arranged in different orientations. Instead of relying solely on temporal modulation characteristics, the system evaluates the spatial distribution and orientation of the received beam across multiple arrays to distinguish between direct and reflected beams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Measurement precision

If quotient comparison method is used to categorize beams, then extraneous beams can be distinguished, but reflected laser beams cannot be detected

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam categorization accuracyVSAvoidreflection detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges the quotient comparison method with spatial evaluation from multiple photo-detector arrays. The final beam categorization combines both the amplitude ratio information (quotient) and the spatial orientation information from multiple arrays, enabling simultaneous detection of extraneous beams and reflected beams.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The multiple photo-detector arrays serve as intermediaries that provide additional spatial information about the received beam. By evaluating the beam's characteristics from multiple spatial perspectives, the system can identify reflected beams that would otherwise be indistinguishable from direct beams using quotient comparison alone.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Device complexity

If standard components are used without special equipment, then device complexity is reduced, but the ability to distinguish reflections from rotating laser beams is limited

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveequipment requirementsVSAvoidbeam differentiation capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent makes the existing laser receiver perform multiple functions by utilizing multiple photo-detector arrays already present in the device. The same arrays used for height measurement are also used for beam identification and reflection detection, eliminating the need for separate specialized equipment while maintaining high measurement precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Solution Approach 2:

The laser receiver uses its own existing detection field and photo-detector arrays to perform beam identification and reflection detection. The system leverages its inherent spatial resolution capabilities to distinguish between different beam types without requiring external辅助设备 or special equipment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach effectively detects reflections and distinguishes between rotating laser beams and non-rotating extraneous beams, reducing the risk of incorrect measurements by utilizing standard components without requiring special equipment.

Implementation Method 1

The laser receiver comprises an evaluation unit and at least one detection field having a longitudinal direction and a transverse direction

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectPhotoelectric Effect: Photoelectric Effect

Data Source

PatentUS12492895B2Method for comparing a received beam incident on a laser receiver with a rotating laser beam
Publication Date: 2025.12.09 HILTI AG
  • US12492895B2 patent drawing
  • US12492895B2 patent drawing
  • US12492895B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for comparing a received beam incident on a laser receiver in a longitudinal arrangement with a rotating laser beam which is moved by a rotating laser in a horizontal position about an axis of rotation, where the laser receiver includes an evaluation unit and a detection field having a longitudinal direction and a transverse direction, includes disposing the rotating laser on a tripod adjustable along an axis and the horizontal laser plane that the rotating laser beam produces is moved by the tripod in a height direction along the axis. In the longitudinal direction of the detection field, the evaluation unit determines an adjustment direction of the received beam relative to the laser receiver, and the evaluation unit compares the adjustment direction of the received beam with the height direction of the tripod.