Laser Processing Recipe Selection for Consistent Quality Control

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

The existing laser processing systems rely heavily on manual operator intervention to control processing quality, leading to significant variations in time and cost due to the number and skill level of operators, making it inefficient and operator-dependent.

Innovation Solution

An automated laser processing system that includes a processing machine, a setting module for preparing testing recipes with set values for processing parameters, a controller for repeated test processing, and an analysis module to select the optimal set values for mass production based on predetermined quality criteria, thereby reducing operator dependency and improving efficiency.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If manual operator control is used to adjust processing parameters, then flexibility in adapting to different materials and shapes is improved, but time consumption and cost increase significantly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveadaptability to different materials and shapesVSAvoidtime consumption for quality control
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-stores multiple processing recipes with different parameter sets in the storage unit before actual processing. When a processing task is received, the system automatically selects and applies the appropriate pre-prepared recipe, eliminating the need for manual parameter adjustment during operation. This preliminary preparation of processing schemes resolves the contradiction by having adaptability ready in advance without time loss during execution.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system replaces the mechanical manual adjustment process with an automated control system. The controller automatically retrieves processing recipes from storage, adjusts parameters, and controls the laser processing machine without human intervention. This substitution of manual mechanical adjustment with automated electronic control eliminates time consumption while maintaining full adaptability to different materials and shapes.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #28Mechanics substitution (Replace mechanical system)

2Manufacturing precision

If manual operator control is used to adjust processing parameters, then skill-based quality control is improved, but dependency on operator skill and variability increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality control capabilityVSAvoidoperator skill dependency
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system performs self-service by automatically selecting processing recipes and adjusting parameters without human intervention. The controller autonomously retrieves appropriate recipes from storage, applies them to the processing task, and controls the laser machine. This self-service capability ensures consistent quality control based on pre-optimized parameters rather than variable operator skill, eliminating dependency on human expertise while maintaining high manufacturing precision.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

Solution Approach 2:

The system manages parameter complexity by organizing multiple processing parameters into pre-configured recipes. Each recipe contains a complete set of optimized parameters for specific material and shape conditions. By changing between predefined parameter sets rather than manually adjusting individual parameters, the system maintains high manufacturing precision while reducing the apparent complexity for operators who simply select recipes rather than tune parameters.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If multiple operators are involved in quality control, then comprehensive checking is improved, but cost and time requirements increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvequality control reliabilityVSAvoidprocessing efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The system implements automated feedback control where the controller continuously monitors processing parameters and quality outcomes. The storage unit stores processing recipes that are automatically selected and applied based on real-time conditions. This closed-loop feedback system ensures reliable quality control through consistent application of optimized parameters without requiring multiple operators, thereby maintaining high reliability while preserving productivity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The system automatically selects the best set values for processing parameters, reducing the time and number of operators required, ensuring consistent and improved laser processing quality regardless of operator skill, and optimizing processing according to specific shapes of the processing units.

Implementation Method 1

a processing machine for performing laser processing on a processing target using a laser beam

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser: Laser

Data Source

PatentUS11772203B2Laser processing system and method
Publication Date: 2023.10.03 NPS CORP
  • US11772203B2 patent drawing
  • US11772203B2 patent drawing
  • US11772203B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A laser processing system includes a processing machine for performing laser processing on a processing target using a laser beam according to a predetermined processing design; a setting module for preparing a processing recipe including a plurality of set values for testing of processing parameters for the controlling the quality value of a predetermined quality item; a controller for repeatedly performing test processing for the processing target in multiple implementation rounds by driving the processing machine by selectively using any one of the set values for testing as the set value of the processing parameters according to a predetermined order; and an analysis module for analyzing each of results of the test processing and individually measuring the quality value of each of the results of the test processing.