Laser Engraver Safety Controller for Isolated Power Enable

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Laser engravers pose safety hazards due to potential fires, toxic fumes, and high-voltage risks, necessitating effective safety monitoring and isolation of safety analysis from laser control systems to ensure safe operation.

Innovation Solution

A separate safety controller, comprising a microcontroller with dedicated hardware and software, monitors sensor data from various components and ensures safe operation by controlling the power supply to the laser, requiring a double-click activation of the start button and displaying fault data to the user.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If safety analysis is integrated with laser control software, then device complexity is reduced, but reliability of safety functionality deteriorates due to potential software updates compromising safety integrity

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesystem integrationVSAvoidsafety functionality integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent divides the control system into two independent segments: a laser controller for operational control and a safety controller for safety monitoring. The safety controller is a separate microcontroller that independently monitors safety conditions and controls the laser power source, ensuring that safety functionality remains isolated from updates or changes in the laser control software.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The safety analysis and monitoring functions are extracted from the integrated laser control software and placed into a dedicated safety controller. This extraction ensures that safety critical operations are performed by independent hardware that cannot be compromised by software updates or bugs in the main control system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #2Taking out (Extraction)

2Reliability

If a separate safety controller is implemented, then reliability of safety monitoring is improved, but device complexity increases due to additional hardware components

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesafety monitoring assuranceVSAvoidhardware components
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The safety controller is designed as a multi-functional unit that performs multiple safety monitoring tasks: reading sensor inputs from various safety components, evaluating safety conditions, controlling the laser power source, and managing the enable/disable state of the laser. This consolidation of multiple safety functions into a single controller reduces the need for additional separate components.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

3Reliability

If double-click activation is required, then safety against accidental start-up is improved, but ease of operation deteriorates due to additional user actions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveaccidental start-up preventionVSAvoidactivation simplicity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSEase of operation

Solution Approach 1:

The system requires a preliminary action (first click) that prepares the system for operation but does not immediately activate the laser. The safety controller monitors for a second click within a predetermined time window to confirm intentional activation. This preliminary action sequence prevents accidental start-up while maintaining a relatively simple user interaction pattern.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Data Source

PatentUS11334048B2Method to ensure safety critical functionality for an electrically powered machine
Publication Date: 2022.05.17 ROBERT BOSCH TOOL
  • US11334048B2 patent drawing
  • US11334048B2 patent drawing
  • US11334048B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A method for ensuring safety critical functionality for a laser engraver includes obtaining a command from a laser motor controller; obtaining sensor data from a plurality of sensors, the sensor data corresponding to an operating status of various components of the laser engraver; determining a functioning status for each component; and as a result of determining the functioning status for all of the components, enabling supply of power to a laser, where the method is performed by a safety controller that is embodied in hardware completely separate from hardware in which the laser motor controller is embodied. One example required functioning status is that a power button has been selected twice in quick succession.