Laser Scanner Data Marker for Scan Gap Detection

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current mobile laser scanning systems face limitations in real-time preview resolution and timeliness due to computing power constraints and screen resolution, leading to undetected scanning errors, especially in environments with weak reflections, which can result in incomplete surveys and costly re-scans.

Innovation Solution

A device that marks gaps in scan data by displaying data markings for consecutive distance measurements exceeding a threshold, allowing immediate correction of scan gaps and errors, even with limited computing power, by using a timer to detect absent reflections and marking them on the screen for corrective action.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Loss of time

If the preview is generated in greatly reduced resolution to minimize computing time-related latency, then the timeliness of the preview is improved, but the ability to detect small-scale scanning errors is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepreview latencyVSAvoiderror detection capability
Core Design Contradiction:
Loss of timeVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent segments the scanning point cloud data into discrete sampling points that can be individually evaluated. By processing and displaying individual sampling points with their quality metrics separately, the system can maintain reduced overall resolution while still detecting local errors through point-by-point quality assessment.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The patent applies local quality assessment by evaluating each sampling point's contribution to the preview based on local criteria such as reflection strength and spatial distribution. This allows the system to identify and flag specific problematic areas (like weakly reflecting objects) without requiring full high-resolution processing of the entire scene.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

2Device complexity

If the screen resolution and human eye resolution are limited, then the device complexity is reduced, but the detection of small-scale scanning errors is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedisplay system complexityVSAvoidscan error detection
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSMeasurement precision

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary quality assessment layer between the raw scanning data and the display output. This intermediary system evaluates each sampling point's quality metrics and attaches quality indicators, allowing the display to show reduced resolution while maintaining error detection capability through the intermediate quality assessment layer.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent changes the parameter representation by adding quality metric parameters to each sampling point rather than relying solely on spatial resolution. By transforming the data representation to include temporal distance and quality indicators, the system can detect errors that would otherwise be invisible at limited screen resolutions.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Power

If undersampling is applied to reduce data amount for preview, then the computing power requirement is reduced, but the detection of missing measured values is worsened

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecomputing power requirementVSAvoidscan completeness
Core Design Contradiction:
PowerVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent performs preliminary quality assessment actions on sampling points before final preview generation. By pre-evaluating each point's quality metrics and temporal characteristics, the system can identify potential gaps and missing data early in the processing pipeline, allowing for corrective measures before the preview is displayed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback mechanisms where quality metrics of sampling points are continuously monitored and fed back to the processing system. This feedback loop allows the system to adjust processing parameters and alert operators to potential scan completeness issues even when operating with undersampled data for real-time preview.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

Enables reliable, fast, and cost-effective environmental measurement by ensuring complete coverage and immediate correction of scan gaps, overcoming limitations in screen and human eye resolution, and reducing the need for re-scan operations.

Implementation Method 1

a vehicle-mountable laser scanner which is designed to scan the environment by means of essentially periodically emitted laser pulses and from the environment-reflected laser pulses to generate a sequence of distance measurement values

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of Flight: Time of Flight

Data Source

PatentEP3869151B1Device for measuring an environment
Publication Date: 2023.04.19 RIEGL LASER MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS
  • EP3869151B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3869151B1 patent drawingFigure 3~6
  • EP3869151B1 patent drawingFigure 5~7

AI summary

The present invention relates to a device (1) for measuring an environment (2) from a vehicle (3), comprising a laser scanner (1') which scans the environment (2) by means of laser pulses (Si) and generates a sequence (14) of distance measurements (di) and therefrom a sequence (35, 36) of sampling points (Pi, Pn) which form a sampling point cloud, and a display unit (1") which projects the sampling point cloud (8') onto a screen (26), wherein the laser scanner (1') generates a data marker (M) for two consecutive distance measurements (di) in the distance measurement sequence (14) whose time interval (ΔT) exceeds a threshold value (TL), or for two consecutive sampling points (Pi, Pn) in the sampling point sequence (36) whose time or spatial interval (ΔT, ΔO) exceeds a threshold value (TL, OL), and wherein the display unit (1") Data marker (M) on the screen (26) the two distance measurements mentioned above.represents locally adjacent sampling points.