Laser Scanner Dynamic Pulse Repetition Rate for Uniform Point Density

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Conventional laser scanners face challenges in achieving uniform scanning point density due to distance-dependent scanning point distribution, leading to inefficiencies in generating reliable 3D point models, especially when scanning varying terrains, and are prone to 'blind ranges' due to pulse repetition rate limitations.

Innovation Solution

A laser scanner that adjusts its pulse repetition rate based on measured distance values from previous scan lines to ensure uniform scanning point distribution and avoid blind ranges by varying the pulse repetition rate across scan lines, using techniques such as sectioning the scan line into subsections and adapting the pulse repetition rate to match changing terrain and distance measurements.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Device complexity

If a constant pulse repetition rate is used, then the device complexity is reduced, but the scanning point density becomes non-uniform across different distances

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecontrol system complexityVSAvoidscanning point density uniformity
Core Design Contradiction:
Device complexityVSManufacturing precision

Solution Approach 1:

The pulse repetition rate is made dynamic rather than constant, adjusting automatically based on measured distance values from previous scan lines. This allows the system to maintain uniform scanning point density across varying distances without requiring complex manual control or preprocessing, as the adaptation happens in real-time during operation.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system uses distance measurement values from previous scan lines as feedback to control the pulse repetition rate for current scan lines. This feedback mechanism enables automatic adjustment of scanning parameters to compensate for distance variations, achieving uniform point density while keeping the control system relatively simple.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Productivity

If the pulse repetition rate is increased to improve scanning speed, then productivity increases, but blind ranges occur due to pulse overlap

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvescanning speedVSAvoidmeasurement reliability
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The pulse repetition rate is dynamically adjusted based on distance measurements rather than using a fixed high rate. This allows the system to operate at high speeds when appropriate while avoiding pulse overlap conditions that cause blind ranges, thereby maintaining both productivity and measurement reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The system changes the pulse repetition rate parameter adaptively based on measured distance values. By modifying this critical parameter in response to actual scanning conditions, the system optimizes scanning speed while preventing the occurrence of blind ranges that would compromise measurement reliability.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

3Reliability

If the pulse repetition rate is reduced to avoid blind ranges, then measurement reliability improves, but scanning speed decreases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvemeasurement reliabilityVSAvoidscanning speed
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

Rather than using a uniformly low pulse repetition rate, the system dynamically adjusts the rate based on actual distance measurements. This enables the system to achieve high scanning speeds when conditions permit while maintaining measurement reliability by reducing the rate only when necessary to avoid blind ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Solution Approach 2:

The pulse repetition rate parameter is adaptively changed based on distance feedback, allowing the system to optimize between reliability and speed in real-time rather than being constrained by a fixed conservative setting.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

4Measurement precision

If adjacent scan strips with overlapping regions are used to ensure sufficient scan point density, then measurement precision improves, but the quantity of measurements increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvespatial resolutionVSAvoidnumber of scan lines
Core Design Contradiction:
Measurement precisionVSQuantity of substance

Solution Approach 1:

The pulse repetition rate is locally adapted to distance conditions in different regions of the scanning field. This allows the system to achieve sufficient scan point density throughout the environment without requiring excessive overlapping scan strips, as the local adjustment of pulse rates compensates for distance-dependent density variations.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Solution Approach 2:

Rather than uniformly increasing scan line density through extensive overlapping strips, the system applies partial adjustment of the pulse repetition rate where needed. This achieves the necessary measurement precision with fewer total measurements by targeting adjustments to specific distance conditions rather than uniformly increasing overall scan density.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #16Partial or excessive action

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach enables the creation of 3D point models with uniform resolution and avoids blind ranges, reducing the complexity and cost of measurement tasks by dynamically adjusting the scanning parameters to match terrain changes and ensuring consistent scanning point density.

Implementation Method 1

determine a distance measurement value to the laser scanner for each sampling point by measuring the time of flight of the laser pulse reflected therefrom

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTime of flight: Time of Flight

Data Source

PatentEP3929617B1Laser scanner and method for measuring an area
Publication Date: 2023.07.05 RIEGL LASER MEASUREMENT SYSTEMS
  • EP3929617B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3929617B1 patent drawingFigure 3~5
  • EP3929617B1 patent drawingFigure 6~7

AI summary

The invention relates to a laser scanner and a method for measuring an environment (4) in which laser pulses (Si,k) are emitted as a measuring beam (5) guided line by line at an angular velocity (ω) over the environment (4) with a variable pulse repetition rate (PRR) in order to generate successive scan lines (Li) of scan points (Pi,k) and to determine a distance measurement value (di,k) to the laser scanner (1) for each scan point (Pi,k) by measuring the time of flight of the laser pulse (Si,k) reflected thereon, wherein the pulse repetition rate (PRRn) in at least a subsection (An) of a current scan line (Li) depends on at least one distance measurement value (di,k) of at least one previous scan line (Li).