Laser Sintering Coupling Window Gas Flow Design

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Laser sintering devices face issues with contamination of the coupling window due to evaporated material and chemical reaction products, leading to reduced transparency and beam deflections caused by temperature gradients between the blowing gas and the process chamber gas.

Innovation Solution

A process chamber design where the lower gas flow is directed away from the coupling window, creating tangential and laminar gas flows that separate dirt-loaded gases from the window, maintaining its cleanliness and minimizing beam deflections.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If a nozzle for introducing blowing gas is provided to protect the coupling window, then the coupling window is protected against contaminations, but temperature gradients between the blowing gas and process chamber gas cause interfering beam deflections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoupling window cleanlinessVSAvoidbeam deflection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The gas flow is divided into an upper gas flow and a lower gas flow that are directed in opposite directions. The upper gas flow protects the coupling window from above, while the lower gas flow directs contaminants away from the window, thereby reducing temperature gradients and beam deflections while maintaining window cleanliness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The gas flow protection is extended from a single-directional approach to a multi-dimensional approach by introducing both upper and lower gas flows that move in opposite directions. This creates a more comprehensive protection scheme that addresses both contamination and temperature gradient issues.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #17Another dimension (Dimensionality change)

2Object-affected harmful factors

If blowing gas is supplied from a single side to reduce beam deflection, then temperature gradient effects are reduced, but dirt deposition on the coupling window surface increases more rapidly

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvebeam deflectionVSAvoidcoupling window cleanliness
Core Design Contradiction:
Object-affected harmful factorsVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The single-sided gas supply is segmented into two separate gas flows: an upper gas flow that protects the coupling window surface and a lower gas flow that directs contaminants away from the window. This segmentation allows both beam stability and window cleanliness to be maintained simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Instead of supplying gas from one side only, the system supplies gas from both upper and lower sides with opposite flow directions. The lower gas flow moves in the opposite direction to the upper flow, creating a balanced system that prevents both contamination and beam deflection.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

3Reliability

If the coupling window is protected from contaminations, then transparency is maintained, but temperature gradients still cause beam deflections

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecoupling window transparencyVSAvoidbeam deflection
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSObject-affected harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The protection system is segmented into two functional components: the upper gas flow that maintains window transparency by preventing contamination, and the lower gas flow that reduces temperature gradients to minimize beam deflection. Both flows work together to address multiple issues simultaneously.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

Different regions of the gas flow have different functions: the upper gas flow region is optimized for contamination protection to maintain transparency, while the lower gas flow region is optimized for temperature gradient control to reduce beam deflection. Each region performs its specific function effectively.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #3Local quality

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

The design effectively keeps the coupling window clean and reduces beam deflections, ensuring consistent laser beam intensity and quality by separating contaminants and mitigating temperature gradient effects.

Implementation Method 1

The gas flow is tangentially to the surface of the coupling window

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTangential gas flow:

Implementation Method 2

within the elevated region a kind of buffer volume of the second lighter gas is formed, by which vapours that are produced in the work zone are kept away from the coupling window

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectGas convection: Convection

Implementation Method 3

the evaporated material or constituents of the same or also chemical reaction products as well as dust particles suspended in the atmosphere of the process chamber deposit at the coupling window

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectDeposition: Deposition (physical)

Implementation Method 4

temperature gradients between the coupling window and the blowing gas on the one hand and the gas within the process chamber on the other hand may lead to interfering beam deflections

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectTemperature gradient: Temperature Gradient

Data Source

PatentUS8895893B2Process chamber and method for processing a material by a directed beam of electromagnetic radiation, in particular for a laser sintering device
Publication Date: 2014.11.25 EOS GMBH ELECTRO OPTICAL SYST
  • US8895893B2 patent drawing
  • US8895893B2 patent drawing
  • US8895893B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A process chamber for a processing of a material by means of a directed beam of electromagnetic radiation is provided, which comprises an optical element (9) for coupling the beam (7) into the process chamber (10), wherein the optical element has a surface (9a) facing the inside of the process chamber, a wall section (12) surrounding the optical element (9), a first inlet (16) for a gas that is arranged at one side of the optical element (9) and designed such that an escaping first gas flow (18) strokes substantially tangentially over the surface (9a) of the optical element (9), a second inlet (23) for a gas, which is designed and arranged such that an escaping second gas flow (25) flows at a distance to the surface (9a) in substantially the same direction as the first gas flow (18).