Laser Spectroscopy Sample Tablet Formation

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing methods for producing analysis-ready tablets for laser emission spectroscopy face challenges in achieving homogeneous melting and cooling, which can lead to cracking or loss of strength due to improper cooling rates, and require complex equipment and controlled conditions.

Innovation Solution

A method involving grinding the sample material and mixing it with a melting agent, followed by further grinding and optional melting, using laser radiation or other energy sources for precise melting and cooling, to create a homogeneous, glassy tablet structure suitable for analysis.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If the melt is cooled quickly, then the tablet formation speed is improved, but the tablet cracks due to uncontrolled cooling

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetablet formation speedVSAvoidtablet integrity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent applies parameter changes by precisely controlling cooling rate parameters within an optimal range (1-100°C/min). The system dynamically adjusts cooling parameters based on melt temperature and tablet stage, transforming the uncontrolled cooling process into a precisely regulated one that prevents cracking while maintaining formation speed.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent implements feedback control through sensors that monitor temperature, humidity, and cooling rate in real-time. This feedback mechanism allows the system to automatically adjust cooling parameters to prevent tablet cracking while maintaining efficient production, resolving the contradiction between speed and integrity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #23Feedback

2Strength

If the melt is cooled slowly, then the tablet strength is improved, but the melt crystallizes and loses strength

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetablet strengthVSAvoidmelt homogeneity
Core Design Contradiction:
StrengthVSStability of the object's composition

Solution Approach 1:

The patent changes the cooling rate parameter to an optimal range (1-100°C/min) that prevents both rapid cooling cracks and slow cooling crystallization. This parameter optimization ensures the melt maintains homogeneity while achieving sufficient tablet strength upon solidification.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

Solution Approach 2:

The patent employs periodic or staged cooling action with different rates at different cooling stages. Initial faster cooling prevents crystallization, followed by controlled slower cooling to achieve strength, resolving the contradiction between maintaining homogeneity and achieving strength.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #19Periodic action

3Manufacturing precision

If separate mixing and grinding devices are used, then the mixing and grinding quality is improved, but the equipment complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvesample mixing and grinding qualityVSAvoidequipment structure
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent merges mixing and grinding functions into a single integrated device that performs both operations sequentially or simultaneously. This consolidation maintains high mixing and grinding quality while reducing equipment complexity and space requirements, directly resolving the stated contradiction.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The patent designs a multi-functional device that can both mix and grind sample materials. This universal device performs multiple operations that would traditionally require separate specialized equipment, thereby reducing overall system complexity while maintaining operational quality.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

Applied Scientific Principles

This section explains which scientific principles are used to turn an abstract innovation direction into a practical engineering solution.

Function Achieved in This Case

This approach ensures a homogeneous sample matrix, reduces matrix effects, and enhances analysis accuracy by creating a stable, glassy tablet that minimizes influences from grain size and mineralogical properties, while simplifying the process by integrating grinding and mixing steps and allowing for precise control over melting and cooling.

Implementation Method 1

using laser radiation or other energy sources for precise melting and cooling

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectLaser radiation: Laser

Implementation Method 2

the sample material (preferably before the tablet is formed) is at least partially mixed with a melting agent... followed by further grinding and optional melting

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectMelting: Melting

Implementation Method 3

the resulting glassy material is then ground and then pressed into tablets

Methodology Applied
Scientific EffectCooling: Cooling

Data Source

PatentEP3394611B1Method for analyzing a sample material
Publication Date: 2021.02.17 THYSSENKRUPP IND SOLUTIONS AG
  • EP3394611B1 patent drawingFigure 1~2
  • EP3394611B1 patent drawingFigure 3
  • EP3394611B1 patent drawingFigure 4

AI summary

The invention relates to a method for analyzing a sample material, wherein the sample material is ground, formed into a tablet, optionally processed, and then analyzed. Said method is characterized in that the analysis is performed by means of laser emission spectroscopy. A system suitable for performing such a method comprises at least a mill for grinding the sample material, a device for forming a tablet from the ground sample material, preferably a tablet press, and a device for analyzing the sample material by means of laser emission spectroscopy.