Laser Scanner and XY Stage Synchronization for Large Workpieces

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing laser machining systems face limitations in throughput and accuracy due to the limited Field Of View (FOV) of laser scanners and the need for complex, expensive controllers to synchronize laser scanners and XY stages, especially when dealing with large workpieces and multiple scanners.

Innovation Solution

A method where one scanner controller acts as a master to synchronize and derive path commands for both the scanner and the XY stage, using separate clock rates and applying corrections to ensure precise movement and firing of the laser beam, with a bridge connecting different real-time networks to facilitate data transfer between the scanner and stage controllers.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Productivity

If a laser scanner is used to move the laser beam at high speed, then throughput is improved, but the working area is limited to the Field Of View (FOV) of the scanner

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidworking area
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSArea of stationary object

Solution Approach 1:

The system divides the overall machining task into two coordinated components: the laser scanner handles high-speed processing within its FOV, while the XY stage moves the workpiece to present different areas sequentially. This segmentation allows each component to operate within its optimal performance range, combining high throughput with extended working area.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The laser scanner is effectively nested within the XY stage system. The scanner operates within its limited FOV while the XY stage provides the broader contextual movement, creating a nested operational structure where the faster scanner is contained within the slower, larger-range stage system.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #7Nested doll (Nesting)

2Manufacturing precision

If the XY stage moves the workpiece at low speed, then positioning accuracy is improved, but throughput is reduced

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepositioning accuracyVSAvoidthroughput
Core Design Contradiction:
Manufacturing precisionVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The motion control is segmented between two systems: the XY stage provides accurate, low-speed positioning for precision, while the laser scanner delivers high-speed beam movement for throughput. The master scanner controller coordinates both systems so they operate in complementary speed ranges.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the operational roles of the XY stage and laser scanner based on the machining requirements. The stage moves slowly for positioning accuracy when needed, while the scanner moves quickly for high-speed processing, creating a dynamic system that adapts speed to functional requirements.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

3Reliability

If a single controller manages both the XY stage and laser scanner, then synchronization is improved, but device complexity and cost increase

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovesynchronizationVSAvoidcontroller complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The control functions of both the XY stage and laser scanner are merged into a single master scanner controller. This unified controller generates and synchronizes path commands for both systems, ensuring coordinated operation while consolidating control architecture rather than using separate independent controllers.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The master scanner controller is designed with multi-functionality, serving both as the scanner controller and the XY stage controller. This universal controller handles multiple functions that would traditionally require separate dedicated controllers, reducing overall system complexity while maintaining synchronization.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #6Universality (Multi-functionality)

4Productivity

If multiple laser scanners are used with one XY stage, then throughput is increased, but synchronization complexity increases

Engineering Contradiction:
ImprovethroughputVSAvoidsynchronization complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

Multiple scanner controllers are merged into a hierarchical structure where one master scanner controller coordinates all scanners and the XY stage. This consolidation allows multiple scanners to operate simultaneously with unified synchronization, managing complexity through a single master controller rather than requiring independent coordination of each scanner.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #5Merging (Combining)

Solution Approach 2:

The control system is segmented into a master scanner controller that handles global coordination and multiple scanner controllers that handle individual scanner operations. This segmentation distributes complexity appropriately, with the master handling synchronization across all scanners and stages, while individual scanners focus on their own beam control.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #1Segmentation

Data Source

PatentUS11826851B2Method and system for laser machining of relatively large workpieces
Publication Date: 2023.11.28 ACS MOTION CONTROL
  • US11826851B2 patent drawing
  • US11826851B2 patent drawing
  • US11826851B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A laser machining device comprises a movable stage which is controlled by a stage controller. A laser produces a beam for machining and the beam is scanned over the part using a laser scanner under control of the laser scanner. The scanner controller controls the stage controller to synchronize movements of the stage with movements of the scanner. The stage may carry the part to be machined or the scanner.