Last-Resort Frequency Hopping for Reliable Wireless Acknowledgement

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Existing wireless communication systems, such as IO-Link Wireless, face challenges in ensuring reliable delivery of critical data due to adverse conditions like fading channels and interference, which can prevent successful acknowledgement and negative acknowledgement messages from being received, even if the data is successfully transmitted.

Innovation Solution

The introduction of additional acknowledgement bits and an adaptive frequency hopping mechanism, including a greedy algorithm for constructing an adaptive hopping table and a last resort frequency mechanism, to optimize packet transmission reliability by dynamically selecting better performing channels and ensuring successful data receipt even under adverse conditions.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Reliability

If traditional acknowledgement mechanisms are used in wireless communication, then the protocol structure remains simple, but the reliability of critical data delivery deteriorates under adverse conditions like fading channels and interference

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacket delivery reliabilityVSAvoidprotocol complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-configures a set of alternative frequency channels and establishes a last resort frequency mechanism before communication begins. When adverse conditions prevent successful ACK/NACK reception, the system can immediately switch to pre-designated alternative frequencies without complex real-time decision-making, thereby improving reliability while maintaining relatively simple protocol structure.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically changes the frequency parameter by hopping between multiple pre-configured channels. The adaptive frequency hopping mechanism modifies the operating frequency based on channel conditions and transmission attempts, allowing the system to escape from adverse conditions like fading channels and interference, thus improving packet delivery reliability without significantly increasing protocol complexity.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #35Parameter changes

2Reliability

If frequency hopping is implemented to avoid interference, then the robustness of communication improves, but the device complexity and protocol overhead increase

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvecommunication robustnessVSAvoidfrequency management complexity
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSDevice complexity

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-configures an adaptive hopping table with multiple frequency channels and their associated metrics before communication begins. This preliminary setup allows the system to perform frequency hopping based on pre-calculated optimal paths rather than complex real-time calculations, reducing the computational burden and device complexity while maintaining communication robustness.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system autonomously manages frequency hopping by maintaining its own hopping table and making independent decisions about frequency selection based on pre-configured parameters and simple feedback mechanisms. This self-service approach eliminates the need for complex centralized control or extensive negotiation between devices, thereby improving communication robustness while keeping device complexity manageable.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #25Self-service

3Reliability

If multiple retransmission attempts are made to ensure data receipt, then the packet error rate decreases, but the latency increases

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvepacket reception successVSAvoidcommunication latency
Core Design Contradiction:
ReliabilityVSLoss of time

Solution Approach 1:

The system pre-configures multiple frequency channels and establishes a hierarchy of retransmission strategies before communication begins. When a packet transmission fails, the system can immediately attempt retransmission on pre-designated alternative frequencies rather than waiting for extended acknowledgment cycles, thereby reducing the time loss while ensuring packet reception success.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #10Preliminary action

Solution Approach 2:

The system dynamically adjusts the retransmission strategy by switching between different frequency channels based on real-time channel conditions and transmission outcomes. The adaptive frequency hopping mechanism allows the system to quickly try alternative frequencies when adverse conditions are detected, reducing the number of retransmission attempts needed and thereby lowering overall communication latency while maintaining high packet reception success rates.

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11036200B2Last resort frequency mechanism in a wireless communication system
Publication Date: 2021.06.15 CORETIGO LTD
  • US11036200B2 patent drawing
  • US11036200B2 patent drawing
  • US11036200B2 patent drawing

AI summary

A novel and useful acknowledgement and adaptive frequency hopping mechanism for use in wireless communication systems such as IO-Link Wireless. One or two additional acknowledgement bits are added to packet transmissions. One is a current acknowledgment bit which indicates whether a packet was successfully received anytime during the current cycle. The second bit is a previous acknowledgment bit which indicates whether packets were received successfully anytime during the previous cycle. An adaptive hopping table is constructed using a greedy algorithm which chooses frequencies with the best PER for transmission of higher priority packets, while equalizing the PER products across cycles. A last resort frequency mechanism further improves transmission success by switching to a better performing channel for the last subcycle when previous attempts to transmit a high priority packet have failed.