Listen-After-Talk Procedure Reconfiguration for Wireless Networks

Resolve Bottlenecks,
Find Innovative Solutions
Generate Solutions

Solution Overview

Problem

Current listen-before-talk (LBT) mechanisms in wireless communication networks face challenges in high traffic scenarios and directional transmissions, leading to inefficiencies and interference, especially with the use of high-gain beamforming and massive MIMO systems, where the hidden and exposed terminal problems are exacerbated by the difference in sensed power between the source and destination nodes.

Innovation Solution

The implementation of a listen-after-talk (LAT) procedure that adapts parameters such as listening duration, data frame size, transmission period, and acknowledgement frames based on a weighted metric considering channel conditions, traffic characteristics, and past behavior, allowing for dynamic reconfiguration and improved spectral efficiency and energy efficiency by reducing idle listening and control overhead.

Engineering Contradictions & Design Principles

VSEngineering Contradiction Analysis

1Adaptability or versatility

If LBT mechanism is used for medium access control, then channel sharing among different systems is enabled, but spectral interference and collisions increase in high traffic scenarios

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvechannel sharing capabilityVSAvoidspectral interference
Core Design Contradiction:
Adaptability or versatilityVSObject-generated harmful factors

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the traditional LBT approach by implementing LAT (Listen-After-Talk) where the destination node performs channel sensing instead of the source node. This reversal of roles fundamentally changes the medium access control dynamics, allowing the receiving end to detect and report channel occupancy, thereby reducing spectral interference while maintaining efficient channel sharing capabilities

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

2Speed

If high-gain beamforming is used to mitigate pathloss, then data rates are improved, but hidden and exposed terminal problems are exacerbated

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvedata rateVSAvoidterminal detection accuracy
Core Design Contradiction:
SpeedVSReliability

Solution Approach 1:

The patent introduces an intermediary feedback mechanism where the destination node acts as a mediator between the source node and the channel medium. The destination senses the channel, detects occupancy, and provides feedback to the source, effectively bridging the information asymmetry caused by high-gain beamforming and resolving hidden/exposed terminal problems

Inventive Principle:
Principle #24Intermediary (Mediator)

3Productivity

If source node performs channel sensing, then transmission decisions are made, but energy efficiency decreases due to idle listening

Engineering Contradiction:
Improvetransmission efficiencyVSAvoidenergy consumption
Core Design Contradiction:
ProductivityVSUse of energy by moving object

Solution Approach 1:

The patent inverts the sensing responsibility from the source node to the destination node. Instead of the source continuously sensing the channel and consuming energy during idle periods, the destination performs the sensing and reports back, significantly reducing the source node's energy consumption while maintaining transmission efficiency

Inventive Principle:
Principle #13The other way round (Inversion)

4Ease of manufacture

If fixed LAT parameters are used, then implementation is simple, but spectral efficiency is suboptimal in varying traffic conditions

Engineering Contradiction:
Improveimplementation simplicityVSAvoidspectral efficiency
Core Design Contradiction:
Ease of manufactureVSProductivity

Solution Approach 1:

The patent implements dynamic adaptation of LAT parameters based on channel conditions and traffic characteristics. The system continuously monitors the operational context and adjusts parameters such as listening duration, data frame size, transmission period, and acknowledgement frames to optimize spectral efficiency while maintaining implementation feasibility through structured adaptation rules

Inventive Principle:
Principle #15Dynamics

Data Source

PatentUS11252759B2Reconfiguration of listen-after-talk procedure
Publication Date: 2022.02.15 TELEFONAKTIEBOLAGET LM ERICSSON (PUBL)
  • US11252759B2 patent drawing
  • US11252759B2 patent drawing
  • US11252759B2 patent drawing

AI summary

Methods and apparatuses are provided for controlling a listen-after-talk (LAT) procedure in a wireless communication network comprising at least a source node (SN) and a destination node (DN). Such methods or apparatuses may obtain information indicating an operational context of the LAT procedure, adapt at least one parameter of the LAT procedure according to the obtained information, and control at least the SN or the DN to communicate according to the LAT procedure having the adapted at least one parameter.